Monday, December 09, 2019

Poll: 44% of NJ residents planning to move away By David Levinsky

Source: https://www.burlingtoncountytimes.com/news/20191125/poll-44-of-nj-residents-planning-to-move-away
November 25, 2019

A recent Fairleigh Dickinson University and Garden State Initiative survey also found that property taxes and the overall cost of living were residents' biggest concerns about the quality of life in the Garden State, followed by government corruption, crime and drugs, bridges and roads and the state's environment.

The poll by Fairleigh Dickinson University and the Garden State Initiative found that 44% of New Jersey residents are planning to leave the state, including 28% within the next five years.

New Jersey has great beaches, top schools and a fantastic location smack between New York and Philadelphia, yet a new poll has found that close to half the state’s residents are mulling moving away, with the state’s notoriously high property taxes and expensive cost of living chiefly to blame.

The poll by Fairleigh Dickinson University and the Garden State Initiative found that 44% of New Jersey residents are planning to leave the state, including 28% within the next five years.

The survey also found that property taxes and the overall cost of living were residents’ biggest concerns about the quality of life in the Garden State, followed by government corruption, crime and drugs, bridges and roads, and the state’s environment.

"These results should alarm every elected official and policymaker in New Jersey," said Regina Egea, Garden State Initiative’s president. "We have a crisis of confidence in the ability of our leaders to address property taxes and the cost of living whether at the start of their career, in prime earning years or repositioning for retirement, New Jersey residents see greener pastures in other states."

The poll is based on a telephone survey of 801 New Jersey adults who were reached between Sept. 26 and Oct. 2. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.9%.

Other notable poll findings were:

• Thirty-eight percent of residents between 18 and 29 plan to leave the state within five years, along with 33% of those between 50 and 64 who are likely nearing retirement. Twenty percent of residents 65 and older were planning to move within 5 years and 23% of residents between 30 and 49.

• Thirty-two percent of residents living in the southern part of the state planned to move away within five years, compared to 26% of residents from the central and northern parts.

• The top response to a poll question for things about New Jersey that contribute to quality of life was "nothing" followed by "close to beaches." Other top responses included "employment opportunities," "good schools/education," "close to NYC" and "diversity."

The FDU/Garden State Initiative poll comes shortly after the release of a similar poll by Monmouth University this month that found about six of 10 New Jersey residents consider the quality of life in the state excellent (15%) or good (46%) compared to 38% who consider it fair (26%) or poor (12%).

Gov. Phil Murphy also sparked controversy last month when he dismissed suggestions that New Jersey’s high property taxes hurt the state’s ability to attract and retain businesses and families and said other benefits outweigh high taxes, including the state’s location, schools, workforce, environment and quality of life.

"If you’re a one issue voter and tax rate is your issue, either a family or a business, if that’s the only basis for which you’re going to make a decision, we’re probably not your state," Murphy said during an appearance at Rowan University. "If that’s literally all you care about, we’re going to lose."

He went on to argue that New Jersey is competitive because of all factors, not just taxes and costs.

"We will compete with any state, any nation in the entire world," he said.

Editorial: ‘All my bags are packed, I’m ready to go ...’

Source: https://www.burlingtoncountytimes.com/opinion/20191127/editorial-all-my-bags-are-packed-im-ready-to-go-

November 27, 2019

Are your bags packed? Because apparently New Jersey is a horrible place to live.

Tell that to the folks who live in North Korea and Syria.

According to a recent poll by Fairleigh Dickinson University and the Garden State Initiative, 44% of New Jersey residents say they intend to leave the state, including 28% within the next five years.

Since so many New Jerseyans are that disenchanted, we will have to assume that no one in their right mind would dare move to New Jersey. That just means more room for those of us who choose to stay.

And what do we get for our determination to ride it out here in the Garden (of No Eden) State?

Exactly what our story on Tuesday led with: "great beaches, top schools, and a fantastic location smack between New York and Philadelphia."

For the discontented, you are more than welcome to go spend the rest of your days with the bison, bobcats, bears and bighorn sheep of Wyoming, but good luck finding a Wawa when you need one. Good luck finding Wi-Fi reception, too.

Year-round beautiful weather in Florida sounds like nirvana. But we’ll take it from someone we know who lives there and likened summers in the Sunshine State to "the surface of the sun."

Don’t you think there are residents in Iowa, Kansas and Arkansas who would love to see the majestic ocean, even once — something we can do any day?

Our country is full of places that are expensive to live. New Jersey’s property taxes and the cost of living were the biggest gripes from those polled. But government corruption, crime and drugs, bridges and roads were also cited as negatives. Sorry, there is no escaping those issues, no matter how far from Jersey you drive.

The top response to the poll question for things about New Jersey that contribute to quality of life was “nothing.” Nothing?

Our internal poll says those people won’t be happy no matter where they are. But we know what state they are in — denial.

Gov. Phil Murphy acknowledged New Jersey's high taxes, but said other benefits outweigh them, including location, schools, workforce, environment and quality of life.

All arguably true. But one factor that seems to get ignored with polls of this kind is support system — that is, friends and family. Aren’t the people we love and who love and support us reason enough to live where we do? If anything, that's what plants most of us where we are.

Not that living in another state should be dismissed. Those of us who have traveled can vouch for the virtues and beauty of the rest of the country.

Sure, Wyoming’s phone reception stinks, but it also has the Rocky Mountains and Yellowstone National Park and more bison, bobcats, bears and bighorn sheep than people. Nothing unappealing about that.

Florida has Disney, lakes and the gulf and the ocean, resort towns, and professional sports teams. If you're a die-hard Phillies fan, Clearwater just might be nirvana.

Relocating should weigh why you want to live somewhere else, not why you want to leave New Jersey.

In defending Jersey, Murphy went on to say, “We will compete with any state, any nation in the entire world.”

It’s not a competition. Of course, nobody likes our high taxes, but we do like the shore, and the rivers, and the mountains, and the schools, and the bustling metropolitan areas and, most of the time, the Eagles. Strong, valid reasons can be argued for living in any of the 50 states. But just remember, as the old saying goes, “No matter where you go, there you are.”


Guest Opinion: If you leave New Jersey, it’s your loss By Scott Warnock

Source: https://www.burlingtoncountytimes.com/opinion/20191203/guest-opinion-if-you-leave-new-jersey-its-your-loss

December 3, 2019

OK, so you want to leave New Jersey …

Whenever I see a New Jersey beatdown like the recent poll that found 44% of residents plan to leave, I wonder: Jersey escapees must move somewhere. Where is this utopia?

Yes, New Jersey’s taxes are high. Our government should run the state more efficiently. And it is frustrating when officials dismiss complaints, such as those voiced in that poll by Garden State Initiative and Fairleigh Dickinson University.

But I know people from other states, including Arkansas, West Virginia and Indiana. Yep, they have low property taxes. But near as I can figure, like us, they have roads, police departments and schools. They pay for them somehow.

These people are clearly taxed in other ways (i.e., state and sales taxes). In ongoing conversations about taxation and cost, I have seen few in-depth, comparative studies with other states and what “cost of living” truly means in the context of services returned.

The poll’s least-satisfied respondents were ages 18 to 29. That’s when life’s journey is just starting. Remember, if you live in Jersey, with its tight connectivity to Philadelphia and New York, your life is quite different than in most places. You have obvious access to those great cities. (Note: Philly was named a “Best Trips 2020” by National Geographic, one of only 25 places globally.) Washington, D.C., and Boston are nearby.

The outdoors? Beaches are our well-known asset, yet we still forget people pay thousands for something Jersey folks enjoy as a day trip. And how many states allow you to day-trip for beaches, skiing and activities like whitewater rafting?

Culture and arts? Do a quick study comparing cultural listings in our newspapers with those nationally. In many places, you’ll wait years for a particular concert or show, and you’ll visit excellent museums only while on vacation.

Sports? Whether Philly south or New York north, we have big-time sports. What about youth sports? In many states, three-hour car rides are routine for league events. Jersey kids can play entire seasons without traveling more than 30 minutes.

Transportation? Our transit systems are imperfect, but in many places it's all driving. We also have multiple international airports close by, a much underappreciated asset.

Let’s get more serious: Education? We have top-tier public schools. Higher education? Many places have slim pickings in regional higher-ed choices. In our small state alone, we have nearly 50 colleges and universities. Expand that to schools across our borders, and you have hundreds of choices. Our community colleges are also widely considered among the best nationally.

Let’s get even more serious: Health care? A simple story: My dear, upbeat neighbor, when she became sick on vacation and was diagnosed with cancer, told me she was lucky to return to South Jersey, where she had ready access to the world’s best medical systems.

New Jersey isn’t for everyone. But some of this “I’m outta Jersey!” stuff is thoughtless. Poll respondents want to escape drugs and corruption. I wish you could.

By the way, this was a poll. As the old saying goes, ask someone a question and they may well answer. The top response to the question about what contributed to New Jersey’s quality of life was “nothing.” Nothing?! Other states: You’re welcome to have that person as a neighbor.

A poll was taken, and some took time to answer. I suspect many others were too busy — either out taking advantage of what New Jersey has to offer or working to make a great place better.


Scott Warnock is a resident of Riverton.

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Transcript of Call Between President Trump and President Zelenskyy

Source: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/25/transcript-of-call-between-president-trump-and-president-zelenskyy/

September 25, 2019

Good grief, talk about a nothingburger – this phone call is fine. Here’s the transcript of the phone call between President Trump and President Zelenskyy.

[White House] President Donald J. Trump has released a declassified, unredacted transcript of his telephone conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy from July 25th, 2019. The transcript can be read HERE.

Full Transcript of Call Between President Trump and President Zelenskyy By The Last Refuge

Source: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/12/reminder-full-transcript-of-call-between-president-trump-and-president-zelenskyy/

November 12, 2019

As the public impeachment hearings begin tomorrow, here’s the transcript of the phone call between President Trump and President Zelenskyy.

[White House September 25th] President Donald J. Trump released a declassified, unredacted transcript of his telephone conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy from July 25th, 2019. The transcript can be read HERE.

.

You can see when you read the transcript, despite the media narrative to the contrary, President Trump did not ask President Zelenskyy to investigate former Vice-President Joe Biden.

Wednesday, September 25, 2019

Trump mocks CNN's Chris Cuomo as 'Fredo,' slams network after UN bilateral meeting By Joseph Wulfsohn

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-cnn-chris-cuomo-fredo-united-nations.print
September 23, 2019

President Trump mocked CNN anchor Chris Cuomo by repeatedly referring to him as "Fredo" -- just weeks after a video of the host taking offense at being called that name went viral.

During a bilateral meeting with Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the United Nations on Monday, Trump took several questions about the whistleblower controversy involving his communications with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. His phone call with the Ukraine leader is alleged to have involved a potential investigation into Hunter Biden, son of former Vice President and 2020 frontrunner Joe Biden.

When specifically asked if he approved lawyer Rudy Giuliani's handling of the controversy in various interviews, the president singled out a clash the former New York City mayor had with Cuomo on CNN last week.

"I think he was excellent," Trump responded. "I watched it the other night... I haven't watched that show in a long time. I don't watch CNN because it's fake news, but I watched Rudy take apart Fredo."


Trump's "Fredo" insult was in reference to an August confrontation that went down between Cuomo and a heckler, who taunted the CNN anchor with a nickname drawn from "The Godfather" movies. Fredo referred to the weak-minded and suggestible brother of Michael Corleone.

"The press doesn't give [Giuliani] credit because they take little tiny snippets where Rudy was a little bit -- if he mispronounces a word, they'll show that and they won't show the whole," Trump continued. "Rudy Giuliani took Fredo to the cleaners. The first time I've watched CNN in a very long time. So I hate to watch it because it's so fake."

Last month, a video posted online showed a man telling Cuomo, in regard to the Fredo tag, "I thought that was who you were."

"No, punk-ass b----es from the right call me 'Fredo.' My name is Chris Cuomo. I'm an anchor on CNN," a heated Cuomo responded. "'Fredo' was from 'The Godfather.' He was a weak brother and they use that as an Italian slur -- are any of you Italian? It's a f---ing insult to your people. It's an insult to your f--kin' people. It's like the N-word for us. Is that a cool f---ing thing?"

CNN'S CHRIS CUOMO SEEN IN VIDEO LASHING OUT OVER 'FREDO' TAUNT

After the man sarcastically told him, "You’re a much more reasonable guy in person than you seem to be on television," Cuomo reacted, "If you want to play, we'll f---ing play."

"If you've got something to say about what I do on television, then say it, but you don't have to call me a f---in' insult," he continued.

"Hey man, listen, I don't want any problems," the man, who appears to be holding the camera from below, told Cuomo.

"Well, you're gonna have a big f---in' problem," Cuomo shot back.

The man, who has been described on social media as a "Trump supporter," repeatedly claimed he thought Cuomo's name was "Fredo." The anchor responded by calling him a "liar" and told him to "own what you said" and "stand up like a man."

Joseph A. Wulfsohn is a media reporter for Fox News.

Obituary - Davis


DAVIS
PHILIP

September 15, 2019 of Maple Shade, NJ. Father of Arielle (Ben Landsburg) Davis and Sean Davis. Grandfather of Jack. Son of Debbie & Steve Davis. Brother of Barry (Diane) Davis, Stuart (Sarina) Davis and Danny (Lisa) Davis. Nephew of James H. Klein; also survived by many nieces and nephews. Relatives and friends are invited Tuesday beginning 10:15 A.M. to PLATT MEMORIAL CHAPELS, INC. 2001 Berlin Road, Cherry Hill, NJ where Funeral Services will begin promptly at 11:00 A.M. Int. Crescent Memorial Park.


Published on Philly.com on Sept. 16, 2019

Source: https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/philly/obituary.aspx?pid=193912871


Davis
Dr. Stephen H.
Age 85

Voorhees - October 7, 2020. Husband of Deborah Klein Davis. Father of the late Philip Davis, Barry (Diane) Davis, Stuart (Sarina) Davis and Danny (Lisa) Davis. Pop Pop of Arielle (Ben), Sean, Talia, Neville, Alden, Eitan, Rayna, Mikayla, Adiel, Ziva, Liam, Rea, Stella, Liev, Charlie and Frankie. Great Grandfather of Jack and the late Chase. Steve was a podiatrist in Merchantville for over 60 years. He was also past president of Region 3 of the American Podiatry Association. Relatives and friends are invited to graveside services on Friday beginning 10:00am at Crescent Memorial Park, Pennsauken, NJ. Masks are required. The service will also be live streamed on the Platt Memorial Chapels Facebook Site. Contributions may be made to Temple Beth Sholom, tbsonline.org, or Camp Ramah in the Poconos, ramahpoconos.org, or Kellman Brown Academy, kellmanbrownacademy.org.


Published in Courier Post from Oct. 8 to Oct. 9, 2020.

Source: https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/courierpostonline/obituary.aspx?pid=196920025

Tuesday, August 06, 2019

The Dayton Murderer Is Proof We Need To Take Left-Wing Violence Seriously By Cathy Young

Source: https://forward.com/opinion/428960/the-dayton-murderer-is-proof-we-need-to-take-left-wing-violence-seriously/

August 6, 2019

Amidst the disturbing trend of political conflict in the United States escalating into violence, it has been a staple of conventional wisdom that the real danger comes almost entirely from the far right. Thus, after journalist Andy Ngo was beaten up by activists from the militant left-wing “Antifascist” movement at a protest in late June, commentators such as Vox’s Zack Beauchamp cautioned against attempts to portray Antifa’s record of violent behavior as even remotely comparable to that of far-right extremists. Beauchamp quoted an Anti-Defamation League primer on Antifa which said, “To date, there have not been any known Antifa-related murders.”

But is that still true today? We don’t know if Connor Betts, the 24-year-old Ohio man who killed nine people (including his own sister) and wounded 27 more when he opened fire on a crowded street in Dayton on Sunday, had any involvement with Antifa. But Betts’s Twitter trail makes it clear that he was a hardcore leftist who embraced some fairly extreme ideas—and, in some cases, advocated violence toward political enemies in Antifa-style language.

The profile for the now-suspended Twitter account @iamthespookster, confirmed as belonging to Betts, identifies him as a “leftist” (and specifies his personal pronouns, a common left-wing calling card). The posts on the account show that Betts—a registered Democrat—was an Elizabeth Warren supporter and a fan of the progressive “Squad,” but also had far more radical political interests.

“I want socialism, and I’ll not wait for the idiots to finally come around to understanding,” said one of his tweets. His retweets included a graphic in which Smokey the Bear, sporting a red face mask with a hammer and sickle, holds up a sign that seems to encourage terrorism against the “capitalists” said to be responsible for killing the planet.

Betts RT

“Kill every fascist,” Betts tweeted a year ago, commenting on the anniversary of the Charlottesville far-right rally. He also retweeted “Punch a Nazi”-type tweets that celebrated street violence against white supremacists. And this past May, Betts shared a tweet by a prominent Antifa account, “Antifash Gordon,” identifying people “confirmed or likely to be at the KKK rally in Dayton,” with the comment, “Know your enemies.”

Betts-KKK

While conservative websites and social media users have eagerly spread the news that the Dayton shooter was a leftist Antifa supporter, mainstream coverage has been far more reticent. In a particularly glaring omission, a BuzzFeed piece discussed right-wing hoaxes trying to link the El Paso shooting to Antifa but made only a passing reference to Betts’s politics, mentioning his status as a registered Democrat but not his far-left views. (The site gave far more attention to the revelation that Betts sang in a “death metal” band whose material often used extreme sexual violence toward women as dark satire.)

Given the fact that Betts was apparently preoccupied with twisted thoughts of violence for years—as a teenager, he was suspended from school after the discovery that he kept “rape” and “kill” lists of classmates—it’s very likely that his horrific act of evil was influenced by complicated factors that had nothing to do with politics. Yet whether left-wing extremism could have been part of his motive seems a very relevant question.

In 2019—after Charlottesville, after the Tree of Life synagogue shooting in Pittsburgh last fall, and now the El Paso massacre—one would have to be either deluded or dishonest to deny the danger of violent far-right extremism in America. One may quibble about the exact body count (for instance, the ADL’s tally of at least 50 murders by right-wing extremists in 2018 includes non-political killings motivated by family/personal conflicts, financial gain, or mental illness in which the perpetrator had some connection to far-right extremism). But it’s clear that the threat is real and serious. It should be equally obvious that some far-right obsessions, notably the “replacement” of white people in the West by black and brown “invaders,” have spread into mainstream conservative discourse to an alarming degree, particularly with the Trumpification of the Republican Party. Trump’s own rhetoric has repeatedly appealed to those fears, as well.

But it is also naïve, and in many cases self-serving, to ignore the potential for political violence on the left.

The most dramatic such incident was the 2017 congressional baseball practice shooting Republicans and was out to kill GOP lawmakers.

But there is also an extensive record of lower-level violence linked to the left and specifically to Antifa, long before the attack on Ngo. Protests have turned to riots and physical assaults on Trump supporters. Innocent bystanders, too, have become victims. Last year, two Marines visiting Philadelphia for a Marine Corps ball were punched and kicked by an Antifa mob that mistook them for participants in a far-right rally. (In a grimly ironic twist, the Marines were Hispanic and were reportedly pelted with racist slurs by the alleged assailants, who include prominent Washington, D.C. Antifa activist Joseph Alcoff.)

Antifa violence has also targeted conservative college speakers such as Charles Murray, a scholar some consider a promoter of “scientific racism”; in 2017, a protest against Murray’s appearance at Middlebury College in Vermont spilled over into a melee in which a female professor escorting Murray out of the building was knocked down and injured.

There have been other, lesser-known troubling incidents with violent overtones. Last November, an Antifa-affiliated news site celebrated the apparent suicide of Richard Morrisett, a University of Texas-Austin professor subjected to a harassment campaign (including threatening graffiti) by a “revolutionary” student group after the exposure of a past domestic violence conviction.

Of course, even if the Dayton shooting is eventually confirmed as an act of far-left terrorism, the far right still has the far higher body count—for now. But that could easily change. As we know from 20th Century history, including the history of terrorism in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s, there is nothing about the far left that makes it inherently more peaceful. The biggest loss of American civilian life to political violence before September 11, 2001 was the 1978 murder-suicide spree in the “People’s Temple” of the Rev. Jim Jones, a communist cult leader who enjoyed the support of quite a few notables on the left, from California Governor Jerry Brown to academic and activist Angela Davis. (The “socialist paradise” left a total of 918 people dead, a third of them children.)

While left-wing violence is dangerous in itself, it also contributes (as the ADL notes in its Antifa primer) to a vicious cycle of right vs. left warfare. The Proud Boys, a right-wing extremist group, thrives on brawling with Antifa. Another far-right group, the West-coast based Patriot Prayer—which also frequently engages in such brawls—was formed in response to Antifa and sees its mission as conservative self-defense.

The cycle seems to be escalating. A little over a month ago, after the Portland street clashes in which Ngo was hurt, Vox published an article by freelance journalist Kim Kelly, a self-identified Antifa activist and anarchist, as “another tool in our struggle for collective liberation.”

Did Betts see himself as a gun-wielding warrior and avenger for the left? We may never know. But it should be clear that we ignore the violent left at our own peril.

Cathy Young is a contributing editor at Reason magazine and is the author of “Ceasefire: Why Women and Men Must Join Forces to Achieve True Equality.” Follow her on Twitter, @CathyYoung63.

Thursday, July 04, 2019

Sitting On The Sidelines

I hope that you have had a great day to this point, whether or not you are celebrating Independence Day. I have not done much today, besides doing walks in the neighborhood both early this morning and earlier this afternoon. The town I currently live in is doing their fireworks this coming Saturday. If you have seen one fireworks display, have you not pretty much witnessed them all?

At the moment,I am waiting for the Phillies-Braves game to start in less than an hour. The one negative to a holiday is that many places or things are either closed or running with a skeleton crew. In many instances, key people are off this week while some companies tried to accomplish as much as they could in a three-day work week. It may be a moot point next year, as July 4th falls on a Saturday in 2020. (Thank you, leap year!) In that instance, I can see corporate America giving their employees off for July 3rd, maybe an early leave the day before. Tomorrow will likely be an off day for many as they try to extend their holiday weekend. I wish safe travels to those that will be on the road throughout the July 4th holiday weekend, whether it be work, vacation, or joyriding.

The good thing about tomorrow is that I will get a chance to spend time with a friend while we are making a donation. I may be old school by saying this, but I still enjoy personal interaction. Granted, texting, Facebook, and other informal means of communication seems to be the new normal today. It is funny, to a degree, that I did hear the song, "I'm Going to Sit Right Down and Write Myself a Letter", earlier today. I am sure that the Post Office would appreciate the business. I have time to kill, and I get to spend time with her. I have been sitting on the sidelines since June. Fingers crossed, I am hoping to hear from somebody next week. Being that I have prior management experience, many key decision makers probably took this entire week off. It has been an adjustment for me, as I had been working continuously for over twenty years. While the time off has been beneficial to both body and mind, it will be relieving to re-enter the workforce.

Take care, and enjoy your weekend. Blessings on your day!

Friday, May 03, 2019

Admit it: Fox News has been right all along By Gary Abernathy


Attorney General William Barr appears before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee Wednesday to make his Justice Department budget request. (Andrew Harnik/AP)

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/04/15/admit-it-fox-news-has-been-right-all-along/?utm_term=.b83bd76c80a3

April 15, 2019

Throughout most of southern Ohio, residents who watch cable news are predominantly glued to one channel: Fox News.

People there don’t watch Fox News to know what to think; they already know what they think, and they avoid news channels that insult their intelligence and core beliefs. Yes, Fox News is an echo chamber for the right, but no more than CNN and MSNBC are for the left, as far as conservatives are concerned. To be fair, when a Democrat is in the White House, the networks switch places, with Fox News criticizing every move, and MSNBC and CNN defending the Oval Office fortress.

But for now, while partisans on the left may quibble, the fact remains that on the subject of collusion with Russia by President Trump or his campaign, Fox News was right and the others were wrong. For at least two years, MSNBC and CNN devoted hour upon hour, day after day, to promoting the narrative that Trump colluded with the Russians, and that special counsel Robert S. Mueller III was going to prove it. That turned out to be wrong.

Along with defending Trump, Fox News hosts such as Tucker Carlson, Laura Ingraham and, especially, Sean Hannity have been slammed for spending nearly two years clamoring for an investigation of the investigators, aligning themselves with the president’s claim of a politically motivated witch hunt. Most of the media portrayed such accusations as preposterous, designed merely to divert attention from Trump’s alleged misdeeds.

But then comes Attorney General William P. Barr, dropping a bombshell last week by declaring during congressional testimony that he thinks “spying did occur” on the Trump campaign in 2016, and that he is looking into it. Democrats and many in the media immediately blasted Barr for carrying Trump’s water. Barr soon clarified his remarks, saying, “I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred. I’m saying that I am concerned about it and looking into it.”

Just three weeks ago, before Mueller wrapped up his report, The Post — in a story representative of mainstream sources at the time — produced a mostly flattering profile of the new attorney general. “A Justice Department official told The Washington Post last month that Barr is viewed at the department as ‘a lawyer’s lawyer’ and is seen as less politically minded than his predecessors,” the story noted.

Timothy Flanigan, a former Barr colleague at the Justice Department, described Barr’s independent streak, saying, “If Bill starts getting the tweet treatment, Bill is a tough guy. He’s a tough, tough guy. Not that Jeff Sessions wasn’t, but I don’t think Bill’s just going to sit there and take it. I think he would make sure that the president understood that it is not really a smart thing to be lambasting the attorney general.”

Now, Barr is being cast by the liberal cable channels and others as an unscrupulous political hack attached to the president’s leash. On CBS’s “60 Minutes” on Sunday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said that Barr “may be whitewashing” his summary of the report. Such accusations represent an unlikely turn of events for a 68-year-old professional with an impeccable record and a career more behind him than in front of him.

For Fox News devotees in southern Ohio and other Trump strongholds, nothing from the Mueller investigation has provided cause to waver from their preferred news source. Meanwhile, even regular viewers of CNN and MSNBC must certainly recognize the straws being grasped to justify sticking with a conspiracy theory that has been largely debunked — although the expected release of Mueller’s report this week will probably provide just enough juice for one last effort.

After two years of conjecture from all sides, some hard truths have emerged. Russia did try to influence the 2016 election. Neither Trump nor his campaign conspired with Russia. The president’s actions did not rise to criminal obstruction of justice. And how and why this all began may well turn out to be the most troubling story of all.

During his confirmation hearing in January, Barr told senators, “I am not going to do anything that I think is wrong, and I will not be bullied into doing anything I think is wrong. By anybody. Whether it be editorial boards, or Congress or the president. I’m going to do what I think is right.” Observers at the time took Barr’s comments as reassurance of his independence from Trump, but in hindsight it should be noted that he mentioned editorial boards and Congress first.

Barr’s career does not paint a portrait of someone who chases tin-foil-hat conspiracies. There’s enough evidence in the public record to raise valid suspicions that the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign was motivated not by real concerns about national security, but rather by a loathing of the candidate. And though new facts may emerge in the full, redacted report, they won’t change the larger truth. It would behoove serious journalists to put aside their political biases and delve into a story that might actually be worthy of Watergate comparisons — even if it includes the painful admission that Fox News has been right all along.

Gary Abernathy, a contributing columnist for The Post, is a freelance writer based in Hillsboro, Ohio.

Wednesday, April 03, 2019

McCain/Palin Supporter Rebecca Ann Burke's Letter to Cindy McCain

Source: https://www.facebook.com/rebeccaann.burke/posts/2321217844566625

March 21, 2019


Rebecca Ann Burke


My dear friends, I apologize. This is going to be long. I received an email solicitation from Mrs. McCain today (her email in the comments section below), seeking donations to the John McCain Institute. I am not so sure that this was not a PAC letter. It infuriated me. After trying to calm feelings after the President's recent remarks, I decided to express exactly where I stand. I hope you approve. What follows is my email response to Mrs. McCain. I am not happy about it, or speaking harshly, but it is true and her attempts to raise money off the most recent controversy sickened me....

Mrs. McCain:

I am truly sorry for the passing of your husband. He, from all appearances, was a wonderful husband and father. However, I cannot, at any time, support any PAC or Institute using his name. His behavior in his last years was not something I am proud of nor can I admire, I believe it hurt our country.

He took his antipathy toward our President to an ugly extent. He rushed a dossier, that I believe he knew was fake, to the FBI. From that action, a cascade of events followed which has at times paralyzed the national agenda, the one we elected the President to implement. The President's children have been enveloped by these investigations. Countless others have been negatively impacted simply by being associated with the President and his campaign, even briefly. The President's businesses which he has spent a lifetime building are under undue scrutiny. The President's wealth did not come from a wealthy wife and her family, he earned every dollar on his own.

Your husband called out the President for unseemly remarks the President made in a private "locker room" talk with a single man, aired publicly over a decade later to hurt him. At the same time, Mrs. McCain, your husband was QUOTED in the media referring to YOU with the very ugly profanity that starts with "C." Your husband was also known to use "spicy" language not suitable to a woman's ears. He held others to a standard he never met.

That cascade of events with the "dossier" has cost American taxpayers millions and millions of dollars in endless investigations, that have only revealed thus far that the dossier was an ugly, dirty, demented piece of fiction to undermine a sitting president. That is repugnant to me. I believe Sen. McCain could not have believed such an ugly piece of fiction. I believe he was aware of how it was written and that it was likely the ugliest of falsehoods. From THAT action of Sen. McCain, the President and his lifetime of work in business have become the subject of investigation. His children have been investigated and required to speak in private against THEIR FATHER. It is this private and public pain that causes the President to still, at times, speak out against the Senator. Let me add, I cannot afford my own health care due to changes since the "Repeal of Obamacare" failed due to last minute sabotage by Sen. McCain. He knew exactly what he was doing, after boasting for years that he and his colleagues would correct this if given the chance. I have had Cadillac insurance coverage my entire life. Now, I cannot afford that I am essentially "cash paying" due to high deductibles that are now the industry standard. Your husband was responsible for causing our families much pain and the loss of cash reserves because of his decision to deny the President a success on a campaign promise. NOTHING could have been a worse path than that under which we struggle every day with no repeal and no corrections.

Sen. McCain took his vindictiveness to a height even those who had helped the Senator at one time, could not believe. In the face of death, Sen. McCain planned his funeral, including honors that are ordinarily reserved only for a president in death, which Sen. McCain decidedly WAS NOT. The President honored those wishes and even more, providing whatever dignified attention and support that were at his disposal. In an ultimate wicked slap in the face, the Senator made it clear that the leader of the free world, who outperformed in multiples, any run for office that the Senator had ever mounted, was denied welcome at the services. That alone was so undignified that I cannot ever imagine honoring in death, a Senator who carried to his grave, more indignities toward our President.

Finally, not only were the President and his family excluded, but by design, Sen. McCain excluded Governor Sarah Palin. Perhaps the senator never understood reality, Gov. Palin brought life to his lifeless run for office. Because of her, we were energized about the Republican ticket. I know. I served as this leading Republican county's co-chair of Women for the McCain/Palin ticket. When he, facing death, expressed that indignity toward Gov. Palin, he lost me and many women who now deeply regret working for his ticket.

Instead of sending out mass emails trying to recreate a dignified vision of Senator McCain, and soliciting funds likely to be used by his "Institute" or a PAC to work against the President, please save yourself time and save me the imposition of having to express these thoughts to you so that you may understand. I also understand a daughter defending her father. However, I find Meaghan's comments about the President to spread fuel on a fire. Her comments during her father's funeral were classless. They were clearly intended to cast dispersion on the President in his absence after he provided many exceptional funeral service honors.

I hope you enjoy a retirement from politics. I, for one, and many like me, (don't underestimate how many we are) do not wish to consider any such pieces of correspondence on the Senator's legacy. His legacy will forever be pock marked by his final vindictive acts. I do not admire that. I wish to forget that. There is NOTHING in these experiences that would ever cause me to donate to the McCain Institute. I hope many others feel as I do.

Respectfully,

Rebecca Ann Burke


Former County Co-Chair, Women for McCain/Palin
Former President, America First Federation
Tennessee Republican Party; State Executive Committeewoman, 2014-2018