Monday, June 07, 2021

Obituary - Hamlet

Edward William Hamlet, Sr.

October 12, 1941 ~ May 20, 2021 (age 79)



On May 20, 2021 Edward Hamlet passed at the Delaware Hospice Center in Milford, Delaware and is at peace with Jesus Christ our Lord.

Ed was Born in Philadelphia, PA on October 12, 1941 to William Matthew and Catherine Dugan Hamlet.  He was the fourth of five children.  He was preceded in death by brothers William, Robert and Hugh “Reds”.

Ed enlisted in the US Navy at the age of 16 and was honorably discharged after four years of service.  He then met and married his wife Joanne of 59 years.  He graduated with a  Bachelor of Science in Health, Physical Education and Recreation from Temple University followed by a Master of Science from the College of New Jersey.  He taught Health Education at Delran Middle School for 32 years in addition to initiating the wrestling team which he coached until he retired. 

Ed is survived by his wife Joanne Abbott Hamlet, children Edward Jr. (Laurie), Lance  (Carol), Brian, Courtney (Fred) and eight grandchildren Tyler, Cory, Tori, Kate, Reese, Brian Jr., Frederick 111, Norah and his sister Nancy Toler.

The family will receive visitors at the First United Methodist Church of Delran, 32 Conrow Road, Delran, NJ 08075 from 11AM to 1PM on June 4, 2021, with a Memorial Service starting at 1PM.

To send flowers to the family or plant a tree in memory of Edward William Hamlet, Sr., please visit our floral store.

Services


VISITATION

Friday
June 4, 2021
11:00 AM to 1:00 PM
First United Methodist Church of Delran
32 Conrow Road
Delran, NJ 08075

MEMORIAL SERVICE

Friday
June 4, 2021
1:00 PM
First United Methodist Church of Delran
32 Conrow Road
Delran, NJ 08075

Source: https://www.rogersfhmilford.com/obituary/Edward-HamletSr

Thursday, May 13, 2021

More than 120 retired generals and admirals sign letter questioning 2020 election and Biden's mental health By Emma Colton

Source: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/retired-military-open-letter-biden-election-mental-health

May 12, 2021

More than 120 retired generals and admirals posted an open letter questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election results and President Joe Biden’s mental and physical health.

"Without fair and honest elections that accurately reflect the 'will of the people' our Constitutional Republic is lost," stated the letter, which was released Monday by "Flag Officers 4 America" and signed by 124 former admirals and generals.

“Election integrity demands insuring there is one legal vote cast and counted per citizen. Legal votes are identified by State Legislature’s approved controls using government IDs, verified signatures, etc. Today, many are calling such commonsense controls ‘racist’ in an attempt to avoid having fair and honest elections,” it continued.

The letter added that the FBI and Supreme Court “must act swiftly when election irregularities are surfaced and not ignore them as was done in 2020.”

Flag Officers 4 America says on its website that it is a group of “retired military leaders who pledged to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” The website adds that retired military members are “bound by that oath to do what we can, in our capacity today, to protect our nation from the threats to her freedom.”

The letter, which also warned of the harms of socialism, Marxism, and “progressivism,” went on to question Biden’s health and fitness for the job.

"The mental and physical condition of the Commander in Chief cannot be ignored. He must be able to quickly make accurate national security decisions involving life and limb anywhere, day or night," the letter said.

The remarks come as former President Donald Trump has continued to argue that the election was “stolen” from him, which has been met with repeated criticisms of being a conspiracy theory.

“The Fraudulent Presidential Election of 2020 will be, from this day forth, known as THE BIG LIE!” Trump said in a statement on May 3.


Wednesday, May 05, 2021

Why I’m Removing All Articles Related to Vitamins D, C, Zinc and COVID-19 By Dr. Joseph Mercola


Source: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/05/04/removing-articles-related-to-vitamin-d-c-and-zinc.aspx

May 04, 2021

Story at-a-glance

  • Over the past year, I’ve been researching and writing as much as I can to help you take control of your health, as fearmongering media and corrupt politicians have destroyed lives and livelihoods to establish global control of the world’s population, using the COVID-19 pandemic as their justification
  • Through it all, I have refused to succumb to these relentless attacks. I have been condent and willing to defend myself in the court of law
  • Unfortunately, threats have now become very personal and have intensied to the point I can no longer preserve much of the information and research I’ve provided to you thus far. So, effective immediately, much of the information on my website will be permanently removed

Over the past year, I’ve been researching and writing as much as I can to help you take control of your health, as fearmongering media and corrupt politicians have destroyed lives and livelihoods to establish global control of the world’s population, using the COVID-19 pandemic as their justication.

I’ve also kept you informed about billionaire-backed front groups like the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), a partner of Bill Gates’ Alliance for Science, both of whom have led campaigns aimed at destroying my reputation and censoring the information I share.

Other attackers include HealthGuard, which ranks health sites based on a certain set of “credibility criteria.” It has sought to discredit my website by ensuring warnings appear whenever you search for my articles or enter my website in an internet browser.

Well-Organized Attack Partnerships Have Formed

HealthGuard, a niche service of NewsGuard, is funded by the pharma-funded public relations company Publicis Groupe. Publicis, in turn, is a partner of the World Economic Forum, which is leading the call for a “Great Reset” of the global economy and a complete overhaul of our way of life.

HealthGuard is also partnered with Gates’ Microsoft company, and drug advertising websites like WebMD and Medscape, as well as the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) — the progressive cancel-culture leader with extensive ties to government and global think tanks that recently labeled people questioning the COVID-19 vaccine as a national security threat.

The CCDH has published a hit list naming me as one of the top 12 individuals responsible for 65% of vaccine “disinformation” on social media, and who therefore must be deplatformed and silenced for the public good. In a March 24, 2021, letter1 to the CEO’s of Twitter and Facebook, 12 state attorneys general called for the removal of our accounts from these platforms, based on the CCDH’s report.

Two of those state attorneys general also published an April 8, 2021, op-ed2 in The Washington Post, calling on Facebook and Twitter to ban the “anti-vaxxers” identied by the CCDH. The lack of acceptance of novel gene therapy technology, they claim, is all because a small group of individuals with a social media presence — myself included — are successfully misleading the public with lies about nonexistent vaccine risks.

“The solution is not complicated. It’s time for Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to turn off this toxic tap and completely remove the small handful of individuals spreading this fraudulent misinformation,” they wrote.3

Pharma-funded politicians and pharma-captured health agencies have also relentlessly attacked me and pressured tech monopolies to censor and deplatform me, removing my ability to express my opinions and speak freely over the past year.

The CCDH also somehow has been allowed to publish4 in the journal Nature Medicine, calling for the “dismantling” of the “anti-vaccine” industry. In the article, CCDH founder Imran Ahmed repeats the lie that he “attended and recorded a private, three-day meeting of the world’s most prominent anti-vaxxers,” when, in fact, what he’s referring to was a public online conference open to an international audience, all of whom had access to the recordings as part of their attendance fee.

The CCDH is also partnered with another obscure group called Anti-Vax Watch. The picture below is from an Anti-Vax Watch demonstration outside the halls of Congress. Ironically, while the CCDH claims to be anti-extremism, you’d be hard-pressed to find a clearer example of actual extremism than this bizarre duo.5

Gates-Funded Doctor Demands Terrorist Experts to Attack Me

Most recently, Dr. Peter Hotez, president of the Sabin Vaccine Institute6, which has received tens of millions of dollars from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation7,8,9, — with funds from the foundation most recently being used to create a report called “Meeting the Challenge of Vaccine Hesitancy10,11,” — also cited the CCDH in a Nature article in which he calls for cyberwarfare experts to be enlisted in the war against vaccine safety advocates and people who are “vaccine hesitant.” He writes:12

“Accurate, targeted counter-messaging from the global health community is important but insucient, as is public pressure on social-media companies. The United Nations and the highest levels of government must take direct, even confrontational, approaches with Russia, and move to dismantle anti-vaccine groups in the United States.

Efforts must expand into the realm of cyber security, law enforcement, public education and international relations. A high-level inter-agency task force reporting to the UN secretary-general could assess the full impact of antivaccine aggression, and propose tough, balanced measures.

The task force should include experts who have tackled complex global threats such as terrorism, cyber attacks and nuclear armament, because anti-science is now approaching similar levels of peril. It is becoming increasingly clear that advancing immunization requires a counteroffensive.”

Why is Hotez calling for the use of warfare tactics on American citizens that have done nothing illegal? In my case, could it be because I’ve written about the theory that SARSCoV-2 is an engineered virus, created through gain-of-function research, and that its release was anticipated by global elites, as evidenced in Event 201?

It may be. At least those are some of my alleged “sins,” detailed on page 10 of the CCDH report, “Disinformation Dozen: The Sequel.”13 Coincidentally enough, the Nature journal has helped cover up gain-of-function research conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, publishing a shoddy zoonotic origins study relied upon my mainstream media and others, which was riddled with problems.14,15

So, it’s not misinformation they are afraid of. They’re afraid of the truth getting out. They’re all trying to cover for the Chinese military and the dangerous mad scientists conducting gain-of-function work.

You may have noticed our website was recently unavailable; this was due to direct cyber-attacks launched against us. We have several layers of protective mechanisms to secure the website as we’ve anticipated such attacks from malevolent organizations.

What This Means for You

Through these progressively increasing stringent measures, I have refused to succumb to these governmental and pharmaceutical thugs and their relentless attacks. I have been condent and willing to defend myself in the court of law, as I’ve had everything reviewed by some of the best attorneys in the country.

Unfortunately, threats have now become very personal and have intensied to the point I can no longer preserve much of the information and research I’ve provided to you thus far. These threats are not legal in nature, and I have limited ability to defend myself against them. If you can imagine what billionaires and their front groups are capable of, I can assure you they have been creative in deploying their assets to have this content removed.

Sadly, I must also remove my peer reviewed published study16 on the “Evidence Regarding Vitamin D and Risk of COVID-19 and Its Severity.” It will, however, remain in the highly-respected journal Nutrients’ website, where you can still access it for free.

The MATH+ hospital treatment protocol for COVID-19 and the iMASK+ prevention and early outpatient COVID-19 protocol — both of which are based on the use of vitamins C, D, quercetin, zinc and melatonin — are available on the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance’s website. I suggest you bookmark these resources for future reference.

It is with a heavy heart that I purge my website of valuable information. As noted by Dr. Peter McCullough during a recent Texas state Senate Health and Human Services Committee hearing, data shows early treatment could have prevented up to 85% (425,000) of COVID-19 deaths.17 Yet early treatments were all heavily censored and suppressed.

McCullough, in addition to being a cardiologist and professor of medicine at the Texas A&M University Health Sciences Center, also has the distinction of having published the most papers of any person in the history of his eld, and being an editor of two major medical journals. Despite that, his video, in which he went through a paper he’d published detailing effective early treatments, was summarily banned by YouTube in 2020.

“No wonder we have had 45,000 deaths in Texas. The average person in Texas thinks there’s no treatment!” McCullough told the senate panel.18 Indeed, people are in dire need of more information detailing how they can protect their health, not less. But there’s only so much I can do to protect myself against current attack strategies.

They’ve moved past censorship. Just what do you call people who advocate counteroffensive attacks by terrorism and cyberwarfare experts? You’d think we could have a debate and be protected under free speech but, no, we’re not allowed. These lunatics are dangerously unhinged.

The U.S. federal government is going along with the global Great Reset plan (promoted as “building back better”), but this plan won’t build anything but a technological prison. What we need is a massive campaign to preserve civil rights, and vote out the pawns who are destroying our freedom while concentrating wealth and power.

Sources and Reference



  • 1 AG Letter to Tech CEOs March 24, 2021 (PDF)
  • 2,3 Washington Post April 8, 2021
  • 4 Nature March 15, 2021
  • 5 Twitter Mercola March 25, 2021
  • 6 WHO Peter Hotez
  • 7 PND July 1, 2011
  • 8 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  • 9 Sabin Vaccine Institute February 11, 2019
  • 10 Sabin Vaccine Institute June 2, 2020
  • 11 Sabin Vaccine Institute May 28, 2020
  • 12 Nature April 27, 2021
  • 13 CCHD Disinformation Dozen: The Sequel
  • 14 Monali Rahalkar Criticism for the Addendum: A pneumonia outbreak associated with a novel coronavirus of probable bat origin (Zhou et al 2020)
  • 15 Monali Rahalkar Critique to the Addendum (Zhou et al 2020) and other contradictions in reporting the facts about RaTG13 and its history
  • 16 Nutrients October 31, 2020;12, 3361; doi:10.3390/nu12113361
  • 17, 18 Lifesitenews.com April 8, 2021
  • Wednesday, April 28, 2021

    Obituary - Zelaney

    Verna Engel Zelaney


    Verna Engel Zelaney was born in 1933 in Phila., Pa and grew up in Cheltenham, Pa. She was a 1951 graduate of Cheltenham High School and received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Music Education from Temple University and did post graduate work in music at Westminster Choir College, Princeton, NJ.

    She began her teaching career as an Elementary Music teacher in the Cheltenham Township Schools for 7 years and then for 25 years in the Delran Township Schools as an Elementary and Middle school teacher and as the High School Choral Director. She also taught music for 5 years at Westfield Friends School in Cinnaminson, NJ.

    She was Choir Director at Church of the Holy Name from its founding in 1975 until 1990. She was also organist at Resurrection Parish (Holy Name and St. Casimir’s Churches) and became the Music Director at Jesus the Good Shepherd (St Peter’s and St Joseph’s Churches) in 2014,

    She was a member of the American Guild of Organists, Association of National Pastoral Musicians, Alumni Board of the Esther Boyer College of Music and Dance, Diocese of Trenton Festival Choir, The Greater South Jersey Chorus, and Burlington Entertainers.

    She is survived by daughter Karen Zelaney of Palmyra NJ. She is also survived by her sister Roberta (Bain) Malone of Akron, Ohio; brother: Clarence (Corky and Joanne) Engel of Laporte, Pa; nieces: Candice and Kyndra Malone, Amie (Andrew) Germain; nephew: Wade Malone, and two great nieces and two great nephews. She was predeceased by her son David Zelaney.

    Services will be held at a later date.


    Published in Burlington County Times from Apr. 22 to Apr. 25, 2021.
    Source: https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/burlingtoncountytimes/obituary.aspx?n=verna-engel-zelaney&pid=198411063

    Verna Engel Zelaney


    Verna Engel Zelaney was born in 1933 in Phila., Pa and grew in Cheltenham, Pa. She was a 1951 graduate of Cheltenham High School and received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Music Education from Temple University and did post graduate work in music at Westminster Choir College, Princeton, NJ.

    She began her teaching career as an Elementary Music teacher in the Cheltenham Township Schools for 7 years and then for 25 years in the Delran Township Schools as an Elementary and Middle school teacher and as the High School Choral Director. She also taught music for 5 years at Westfield Friends School in Cinnaminson, NJ.

    She was Choir Director at Church of the Holy Name from its founding in 1975 until 1990. She was also organist at Resurrection Parish (Holy Name and St. Casimir's Churches) and became the Music Director at Jesus the Good Shepherd (St Peter's and St Joseph's Churches) in 2014,
    She was a member of the American Guild of Organists, Association of National Pastoral Musicians, Alumni Board of the Esther Boyer College of Music and Dance, Diocese of Trenton Festival Choir, The Greater South Jersey Chorus, and Burlington Entertainers.

    She is survived by daughter Karen Zelaney of Palmyra NJ. She is also survived by her sister Roberta (Bain) Malone of Akron, Ohio; brother: Clarence (Corky and Joanne) Engel of Laporte, Pa; nieces: Candice and Kyndra Malone, Amie (Andrew) Germain; nephew: Wade Malone, and two great nieces and two great nephews. She was predeceased by her son David Zelaney.

    Come celebrate 87 years on June 5, 2021 from 9:30-10:30 am at Jesus the Good Shepherd. (St Joseph's site) Mass of Christian Burial will be celebrated 10:30 am. Interment private. In lieu of flowers donations may be made to stjude.org or amfAR.org.


    Published in Burlington County Times from May 25 to May 30, 2021. Source: https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/burlingtoncountytimes/obituary.aspx?n=verna-engel-zelaney&pid=198791255

    From Soft Liberalism to Iron-Fisted Leftism in Today's U.S. Military By Aaron Reitz


    Source: https://www.newsweek.com/soft-liberalism-iron-fisted-leftism-todays-us-military-opinion-1576950

    March 19, 2021

    In the Marine Corps, we don't have quotas, but we do have goals. And Marines accomplish goals," my officer-in-charge told me and a few other brand-new second lieutenants, each of us assigned to temporary recruiting duty while awaiting orders to Quantico. The captain then told us we had to sign up a certain number of college-enrolled racial minorities and females. No need to be too strict on physical fitness or academics, he said. Just bring them in.

    That was in 2009. Discrimination of this sort has been an ingrained yet lamentable part of the military's recruitment, retention and promotion practices for many years. But my fellow officers and I couldn't have imagined that, 12 years later, our disagreement with these policies would get us labeled "racist," "sexist," "bigoted" or "extremists" worthy of "eradication" and "elimination" from the USMC. Yet the Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps said as much in his February 22 "core values" memo.

    I'm now a major in the Marine Corps Reserve and a member of a formerly all-male infantry battalion.* This past weekend we had our monthly drill period. A few days before drill, the command told us that all scheduled training on Sunday morning was canceled and replaced with a "stand-down to address extremism in the ranks."

    It was left-wing political programming, as direct as it sounds.

    We were instructed that there is a Taliban-like threat in the United States called "domestic terrorism." These terrorists are characterized in part by "anti-government," "anti-authority" or "abortion-related" extremism and various "supremacist" ideas. None of these terms are defined. The Marine Corps entrusts the government's HR department to figure that out.

    Reporting requirements are key. Do you suspect someone supports an "extremist ideology?" Alert the chain of command. Have you heard a Marine express "contempt toward officials?" Notify the Naval Criminal Investigative Service. Don't handle anything on your own. Just rat them out. After all, "service is a privilege" and it'd be a shame to lose that privilege for failing to do your part to stamp out "extremists." One PowerPoint slide posed this imperative in stark terms: "Do you want to be a Marine or do you want to be part of an organization that sows disunity and hate. You cannot have divided loyalties."

    Where did all this come from? Soft liberalism has taken root in the military over several decades. These alarming trends are already well documented in James Hasson's book Stand Down: How Social Justice Warriors Are Sabotaging America's Military. But in the wake of President Joe Biden's election—and more precipitously since the January 6 "insurrection"—bureaucratic progressivism has hardened into iron-fisted wokeism.

    January 6 provided the pretext that the government, media and Democratic Party needed to drum up paranoia about white-nationalist domestic terrorism. A month later, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin issued a memo to all Pentagon leadership laying the groundwork for my unit's Sunday morning indoctrination.

    In his memo, Austin announced that the Department of Defense "will not tolerate...actions associated with extremist or dissident ideologies" and ordered all 1.4 million personnel to receive "extremism" training. And he promised it was just the beginning: the "stand-down is just the first initiative of what I believe must be a concerted effort to...eliminate the corrosive effects that extremist ideology and conduct have on the workforce."

    Acting Secretary of the Navy Thomas Harker followed with his own memo. He announced the objective for the entire Navy Department: nothing short of "eradicating extremism." How? By rooting out "actions that betray our oaths" like promoting "ideology" or "doctrine" that challenges the "gender identity and sexual orientation" agenda or advancing efforts that allegedly "deprive individuals of their civil rights."

    In other words, advocating for the Biblical view of sex and marriage in law and policy is, according to today's armed forces, tantamount to oath betrayal.

    Then came the Marine Corps' turn to mouth the right things about "extremism." In late February, the highest-ranking enlisted Marine issued a memo to all hands condemning our institutional failure to "completely eliminate," "eradicate," and "conquer" all "racists, bigots, homophobes and bullies." Those people "are not welcome" in the military. "It is impossible," the memo says, "to be both a good Marine and be any one of those things at the same time." Again, specifics of "those things" are undefined. The author of the memo and the four-star Commandant leave that to the military's Diversity and Inclusion Task Force.

    Finally, on March 5, the Marine Corps released an official directive: no later than April 2, all "commanders and supervisors at all levels will conduct and document a leadership stand-down in order to address issues of extremism in the ranks." The commandant included a video with the directive, saying, "We must continuously strive to eliminate any division in our ranks."

    We all know what that means: any dissension on any issue that Biden-appointed top brass says is racist, sexist or homophobic will not be tolerated.

    There is no doubt as to where all this is headed. The Pentagon's swift and coordinated "smiting" of Tucker Carlson, who had the gall to "diss" the idea of sending pregnant women to war—an obviously absurd idea to all but the most politically correct officers grasping for a promotion—makes it very clear.

    How did we get here? The truth is that today's military is running on the fumes of our vastly superior forefathers and the ever-shrinking proportion of each branch that still does truly heroic work and accomplishes truly extraordinary feats. The rest is a bloated military-industrial complex given over to Fortune 500-style corporate progressivism.

    And if it's bad in the Marine Corps, imagine how much worse it is in the other services.

    America's enemies are laughing at us. Frankly, we deserve it. But it doesn't need to be this way. To get back on top, our military must reject "extremism" training, reverse all the progressive policies enacted over the past several years, return to a true meritocracy and focus exclusively on the only thing that matters: winning wars.

    We need a military fit for real warriors—not the social justice kind.

    Aaron Reitz is a Major in the USMC Reserve, an Afghanistan War veteran and the Texas Deputy Attorney General for Legal Strategy.

    * I prepared this article off-duty and in my personal capacity. The views I express here are solely mine and do not reflect those of the Department of Defense, Department of the Navy or the Office of the Attorney General of Texas.

    Saturday, April 24, 2021

    Ronald Reagan Spoke & Wrote About Gun Control


    Ronald Reagan's three-part syndicated radio commentaries on gun control from June 1975



    President Reagan's Remarks at the Annual Banquet of the National Rifle Association (NRA) in Phoenix, Arizona on May 6, 1983


    Why I'm for the Brady Bill By Ronald Reagan

    Source: https://www.nytimes.com/1991/03/29/opinion/why-i-m-for-the-brady-bill.html

    March 29, 1991


    "Anniversary" is a word we usually associate with happy events that we like to remember: birthdays, weddings, the first job. March 30, however, marks an anniversary I would just as soon forget, but cannot.

    It was on that day 10 years ago that a deranged young man standing among reporters and photographers shot a policeman, a Secret Service agent, my press secretary and me on a Washington sidewalk.

    I was lucky. The bullet that hit me bounced off a rib and lodged in my lung, an inch from my heart. It was a very close call. Twice they could not find my pulse. But the bullet's missing my heart, the skill of the doctors and nurses at George Washington University Hospital and the steadfast support of my wife, Nancy, saved my life.

    Jim Brady, my press secretary, who was standing next to me, wasn't as lucky. A bullet entered the left side of his forehead, near his eye, and passed through the right side of his brain before it exited. The skills of the George Washington University medical team, plus his amazing determination and the grit and spirit of his wife, Sarah, pulled Jim through. His recovery has been remarkable, but he still lives with physical pain every day and must spend much of his time in a wheelchair.

    Thomas Delahanty, a Washington police officer, took a bullet in his neck. It ricocheted off his spinal cord. Nerve damage to his left arm forced his retirement in November 1981.

    Tim McCarthy, a Secret Service agent, was shot in the chest and suffered a lacerated liver. He recovered and returned to duty.

    Still, four lives were changed forever, and all by a Saturday-night special -- a cheaply made .22 caliber pistol -- purchased in a Dallas pawnshop by a young man with a history of mental disturbance.

    This nightmare might never have happened if legislation that is before Congress now -- the Brady bill -- had been law back in 1981.

    Named for Jim Brady, this legislation would establish a national seven-day waiting period before a handgun purchaser could take delivery. It would allow local law enforcement officials to do background checks for criminal records or known histories of mental disturbances. Those with such records would be prohibited from buying the handguns.

    While there has been a Federal law on the books for more than 20 years that prohibits the sale of firearms to felons, fugitives, drug addicts and the mentally ill, it has no enforcement mechanism and basically works on the honor system, with the purchaser filling out a statement that the gun dealer sticks in a drawer.

    The Brady bill would require the handgun dealer to provide a copy of the prospective purchaser's sworn statement to local law enforcement authorities so that background checks could be made. Based upon the evidence in states that already have handgun purchase waiting periods, this bill -- on a nationwide scale -- can't help but stop thousands of illegal handgun purchases.

    And, since many handguns are acquired in the heat of passion (to settle a quarrel, for example) or at times of depression brought on by potential suicide, the Brady bill would provide a cooling-off period that would certainly have the effect of reducing the number of handgun deaths.

    Critics claim that "waiting period" legislation in the states that have it doesn't work, that criminals just go to nearby states that lack such laws to buy their weapons. True enough, and all the more reason to have a Federal law that fills the gaps. While the Brady bill would not apply to states that already have waiting periods of at least seven days or that already require background checks, it would automatically cover the states that don't. The effect would be a uniform standard across the country.

    Even with the current gaps among states, those that have waiting periods report some success. California, which has a 15-day waiting period that I supported and signed into law while Governor, stopped nearly 1,800 prohibited handgun sales in 1989. New Jersey has had a permit-to-purchase system for more than two decades. During that time, according to the state police, more than 10,000 convicted felons have been caught trying to buy handguns.

    Every year, an average of 9,200 Americans are murdered by handguns, according to Department of Justice statistics. This does not include suicides or the tens of thousands of robberies, rapes and assaults committed with handguns.

    This level of violence must be stopped. Sarah and Jim Brady are working hard to do that, and I say more power to them. If the passage of the Brady bill were to result in a reduction of only 10 or 15 percent of those numbers (and it could be a good deal greater), it would be well worth making it the law of the land.

    And there would be a lot fewer families facing anniversaries such as the Bradys, Delahantys, McCarthys and Reagans face every March 30.

    Sunday, April 04, 2021

    Phillips Philes PHLASHBACK: Ronald Reagan's Pre-Presidential California Staff Remembered


    Lyn Nofziger: An Appreciation By Nicholas Thimmesch

    Source: https://spectator.org/47213_lyn-nofziger-appreciation/

    March 29, 2006, 4:07 AM

    Lyn Nofziger, who passed away from cancer Monday at his longtime home in the Washington suburb of Falls Church, Virginia, was the epitome of the cliche, “Salt of the earth.” Rumpled, cantankerous, outspoken, and yet sublime, Nofziger was a witness with a front row seat to both Reagan Revolutions, the first one that took place in the 1960s and ’70s on Lyn’s native soil, California, and the second one that took place on the national and then international stage in the 1980s.

    It was Nofziger who fielded reporters’ frantic questions about a gravely wounded Reagan after John Hinckley nearly took his life shortly after becoming president. It was Nofziger who knew enough about Reagan’s Rock of Gibraltar, Nancy, to never cross her. And it was Nofziger who, in his latter years, never shied away from challenging a conservative movement that had lost its Reagan values to return to those rock bed principles.

    Late last year, Nofziger took President Bush to task in his highly amusing “Musings” blog: “I am one of thousands of Americans who is on what used to be called the president’s Christmas card list. As a result, a card from George and Laura arrived in my mail today. Needles to say, I was pleased and honored. After opening it, I was and am, needless to say, also disappointed. The card was not a Christmas card; it was a holiday card.”

    A confounded Nofziger continued: “Inside there was no mention of Christmas. Instead, it says, ‘With best wishes for a holiday season of hope and happiness in 2005.’

    “What a shame,” Nofziger mused, “that, apparently for political reasons, a president who professes to be a strong Christian turns his back on the celebration of his Savior’s birth because he doesn’t wish to offend anyone — except maybe his fellow Christians.”

    Right up to the end, when Lyn was dying of the very disease that had consumed his 38-year-old daughter, he was willing, despite his condition, to tell me the story of that revolution and how it has been derailed. Lyn Nofziger, the professional spokesman, right to the very end.

    NOFZIGER CAME TO REAGAN as so many have, by circumstance and happenstance, but like many who followed one of our nation’s greatest leaders, he was not just a conservative, he was a “Reagan conservative.”

    As a national political reporter for Copley News Service in the 1960s, Nofziger was even then a rare commodity: a Republican reporter. When owner Jim Copley approached and finally convinced Nofziger after failed attempts to get him on board the Reagan mule train, Nofziger thought the former actor turned political activist would lose California’s Republican gubernatorial primary in 1966 and be done with it: he was wrong. Reagan went on to win the nomination and then the governorship. Whether Nofziger knew it or not then, he was going to become a Reaganite for life and be a critical part of one of the most successful political careers in American politics.

    Nofziger stayed with Reagan, through the “Kitchen Cabinet” days, through the Citizens for the Republic days, through the landslide presidential victory in 1980 and the resulting administration. Nofziger, unlike so many Republicans of late, stayed with Reagan beyond his death in 2004 by staying true to the conservative principles that made both Reagan and America great in the 1980s.

    Reagan’s affection for Lyn Nofziger might best be found in his use of the name “Lynwood” for him. Nofziger told interviewers Stephen Knott and Russell Riley in their brilliant 2003 interview for the Miller Center for Public Affairs — which I highly recommend Reaganites and Lynites read — it was just something Reagan did:

    “You’ve mentioned the fact that he always called you Lynwood. What was that? Did you ever attempt to straighten him out on that front?” asked Knott and Riley.

    Nofziger replied: “No, he called me Lynwood. He did it time after time after time. My name is Franklyn, which I hate, and I’ve never gone by it. I know that when someone calls me Franklin, that they don’t know me. I don’t know. I guess it was kind of a term of affection.”

    Nofziger also spoke to the notion that there was a “veil” that surrounded Ronald Reagan:

    “There was, I always felt — less as I got used to it — but I always felt that no matter how cordial he was, how congenial he was, and how well you got along, there was always something there between him and you. I couldn’t put a finger on it, but you just never felt that you got really next to him. I would talk to other people who felt the same way, and Nancy never said this to me, but I’m told Nancy said the same thing.”

    Many accounts of Nancy Reagan’s — some even attributed, perhaps falsely, to Nofziger — overbearing protectiveness of her husband portray a woman who viewed people around Reagan as either helping or hurting him. But it was an often misunderstood Nancy Reagan who afforded Nofziger what was perhaps his best moment before the press, when she passed along to him Reagan’s quip after the Hinckley shooting, “Honey, I forgot to duck.” Nofziger’s conveyance of that anecdote to the media helped bring humor and hope to a shocked American public: it was why he was perhaps the finest spokesman a political figure could ever want to have.

    ALSO TO BE FOUND AMONG Lyn Nofziger’s “Musings” was something that related to another one of my greatest admirations for Lyn: his common sense sensibility, even if it was contraire to the current conventional conservatism. As I mentioned, Lyn’s daughter died a painful death from cancer, one in which she found little relief from mainstream medicine’s traditional medication. In a Washington Post in the late 1990s, Nofziger wrote about something that did work:

    When our daughter was undergoing chemotherapy for lymph cancer, she was sick and vomiting constantly as a result of her treatments. No legal drugs, including Marinol, helped her.

    We finally turned to marijuana. With it, she kept her food down, was comfortable and even gained weight. Those who say Marinol and other drugs are satisfactory substitutes for marijuana may be right in some cases but certainly not in all cases. If doctors can prescribe morphine and other addictive medicines, it makes no sense to deny marijuana to sick and dying patients when it can be provided on a carefully controlled, prescription basis.

    Nofziger, who valiantly agreed to participate in a 2002 Capitol Hill news conference in support of Congressman Barney Frank’s “State’s Rights to Medical Marijuana Act” legislation, took to task a “compassionate conservative” Bush over the issue:

    “Next week I will participate in a news conference that calls for an end to federal persecution of persons using or supplying marijuana for medicinal purposes in states where law permits it.”

    Addressing the president, who as a candidate, seemingly supported states’ rights when it came to medical marijuana, Nofziger wrote:

    “It seems to me that the very definition of compassionate conservatism should convince President Bush to support legislation that would allow states to legalize the use of marijuana for medical purposes. In fact, if the president understands the meaning of those two words (‘compassionate conservative’) not to support Frank is to reject the philosophy for which he says he stands and on which he ran for president.”

    Lyn Nofziger: a conservative, a true conservative, a Reagan conservative to the very end.

    Lyn was a stand up guy in a town full of men who sit down when they urinate: he will be sorely missed.


    Michael Deaver, Reagan’s master image-maker, dies at 69 By Douglass K. Daniel

    Source: https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/michael-deaver-reagans-master-image-maker-dies-at-69/

    August 19, 2007


    WASHINGTON — Michael Deaver, a close adviser to Ronald Reagan who directed the president’s picturesque and symbolic public appearances, died Saturday. He was 69.

    Mr. Deaver, who had pancreatic cancer, died at his home in Bethesda, Md., according to a statement from the Deaver family that was issued by Edelman, the public-relations firm he served as vice chairman.

    Mr. Deaver was celebrated and scorned as an expert at media manipulation for focusing on how the president looked as much as what the president said. Reagan’s chief choreographer for public events, Mr. Deaver protected the commander in chief’s image and enhanced it with a flair for choosing just the right settings, poses and camera angles.

    “I’ve always said the only thing I did is light him well,” Mr. Deaver told the Los Angeles Times in 2001. “My job was filling up the space around the head. I didn’t make Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan made me.”

    Mr. Deaver’s image suffered a setback in 1987. He was convicted on three of five counts of perjury stemming from statements to a congressional subcommittee and a federal grand jury investigating his lobbying activities with administration officials.

    He blamed alcoholism for lapses in memory and judgment. He was sentenced to three years’ probation and fined $100,000 as well as ordered to perform 1,500 hours of public service.

    When the subject of a pardon surfaced in Reagan’s final days in office in 1989, the president noted that Mr. Deaver had indicated he would not accept one, according to Reagan’s diary.

    Mr. Deaver’s family said in the statement Saturday that he fought his cancer “with the courage, grace and good spirit that he carried throughout his life. … In the end, he stood as the model of a man who not only loved life, but lived life right, one day at a time.”

    Former first lady Nancy Reagan said in a statement that Mr. Deaver “was the closest of friends to both Ronnie and me in many ways, and he was like a son to Ronnie.” She added, “We met great challenges together. … I will miss Mike terribly.”

    Mr. Deaver brought a public-relations background and a long association with Reagan to his work as White House deputy chief of staff from 1981-85. He and top Reagan advisers Edwin Meese and James Baker were known as “the troika” that, in effect, managed the presidency.

    Mr. Deaver, however, was concerned more with Reagan’s image than his policies. He also was responsible for the president’s schedule and security, and he served as a liaison for family matters.

    To exert as much control as possible, Mr. Deaver steered the president away from reporters when he could, instead arranging Reagan in poses and settings that conveyed visually the message of the moment. Presidential news conferences were a rarity, which suited an actor-turned-politician who was at his best when using a script.

    Meese said Mr. Deaver “had great imagination, great innovation.”

    A spokesman for President Bush, Gordon Johndroe, said Mr. Deaver “knew the importance in our democracy of communicating with the American people, and he will be missed.”

    Mr. Deaver was born April 11, 1938, in Bakersfield, Calif., the son of a Shell Oil distributor. He played piano in bars while studying political science at San Jose State College. He received his bachelor’s degree in 1960.

    He worked for IBM and served in the Air Force. An interest in politics later led him to the Santa Clara County Republican Party. Hired as its executive director, he soon was organizing political campaigns for GOP candidates.

    Mr. Deaver’s work on behalf of the Reagans began when he joined the gubernatorial staff in Sacramento after Reagan’s election in 1966. He became a detail-oriented aide focused on helping the governor run a smooth day-to-day schedule.

    Mr. Deaver formed a company after Reagan left the state capital — the former governor and presidential aspirant was his chief client — and then joined Reagan in Washington after his 1980 election.

    Among the president’s advisers, Mr. Deaver was the closest to Nancy Reagan. But their relationship suffered after his 1987 convictions and criticism that he was “cashing in” on his ties to the White House. “Somewhere along the line in Washington, Mike Deaver went off track and caught a bad case of Potomac fever,” she wrote.

    Time eventually repaired their friendship, and Mr. Deaver spoke with the former first lady nearly every week for years.

    He wrote four books touching on his White House years and his relationship with the Reagans.

    Survivors include his wife, Carolyn, whom he met while they were staffers for the Reagan administration in Sacramento. They had two children, Amanda Deaver, of Washington, and Blair Deaver of Bend, Ore.


    Martin Anderson: Reagan Adviser and Man for Many Seasons By Lou Cannon

    Source: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/01/06/martin_anderson_reagan_adviser_and_man_for_many_seasons_125148.html

    January 06, 2015

    Martin Anderson, an economist and adviser to three presidents who helped explain economic policy to Ronald Reagan and Reagan to the world, died last week at his home in Portola Valley, Calif., after an influential career. He was 78.

    As a special assistant to President Richard Nixon from 1969 to 1971, Anderson is credited with drawing up the proposal that led to the end of military conscription in the United States. He also brought into government economist Alan Greenspan, who, like Anderson, was an adherent of iconoclastic free-market philosopher Ayn Rand.

    Anderson left the Nixon administration to become a fellow at the Hoover Institution, a prominent conservative think tank at Stanford University. He took periodic leaves to help Reagan in his 1976 and 1980 presidential campaigns and served as White House director of policy development in the first year of the Reagan presidency. Anderson wrote about Reagan’s first term in a 1988 book, “Revolution: The Reagan Legacy.”

    Together with his wife and fellow economist Annelise Graebner Anderson and Kiron K. Skinner, Martin Anderson made an important historical contribution in editing collections of Reagan’s writings and voluminous correspondence with ordinary Americans: “Reagan, In His Own Hand” (2001) and “Reagan: A Life in Letters” (2003). These books demonstrated Reagan’s pithy insights and sense of country better than any political argument ever did.

    The Andersons in 2009 wrote “Reagan’s Secret War: The Untold Story of His Fight to Save the World from Nuclear Disaster,” which focused on Reagan’s efforts to develop a missile shield to protect the nation from nuclear attack and ultimately to abolish nuclear weapons.

    Martin Anderson was present at the incident that led to Reagan’s epiphany on missile defense. The two men toured the headquarters of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) at Cheyenne Mountain in Colorado on July 31, 1979. Reagan was shown how radar could track an incoming missile but not stop it. “We have spent all that money and have all that equipment, and there is nothing we can do to prevent a nuclear missile from hitting us,” Reagan said on their flight home to Los Angeles, Anderson recounted in “Revolution.”

    Although the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) that Reagan proposed as president was derided by many scientists as unworkable, it helped bring the Soviets to the bargaining table, where Reagan and Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev agreed on the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty of 1987 that became the template for future arms agreements between the United States and Russia.

    Anderson continued to the end of his days to advocate U.S. missile defense, now focused on intercepting nuclear warheads launched by terrorists or a rogue nation.

    During the Reagan presidency, Anderson served as an effective go-between for Reagan and Paul Volcker, the blunt-spoken chairman of the Federal Reserve Board. Volcker, appointed by President Jimmy Carter, was distrusted by many Republicans and had been bureaucratically denied a White House pass. He wrote Anderson in complaint. Anderson took the letter to Reagan, who saw to it that Volcker got his pass.

    More important, Reagan and Volcker became allies in the Fed chairman’s efforts to curb runaway inflation. The policy worked, leading to a record 90 consecutive months of economic growth after a brief but deep recession.

    During the 1980 presidential campaign, which I covered for The Washington Post, Anderson played a constructive role. Reagan had loads of economic advice in this campaign, but it went off in different directions. Greenspan and Anderson helped Reagan formulate a coherent policy from conflicting advice given by traditional and supply-side economists. Reagan shortened it into a punchy narration: “Recession is when your neighbor loses his job. Depression is when you lose yours. And recovery is when Jimmy Carter loses his.”

    I had many dealings with Anderson during the campaign, when he was in the White House and when I was writing my biographies of Reagan, and much respected him for his insights and honesty. When he had complaints about something I had written, he typically registered them with courtly good humor. More than once, he helped me understand an economic issue with which I was struggling. He was alert for verbal missteps by Reagan, of which there were several in both the 1976 and 1980 campaigns. In 1980 Anderson came up with an inventive explanation to a New York Times reporter who had pointed out various Reagan errors. The problem, Anderson explained blithely, was that Reagan used hundreds of examples in his speeches. “Ninety-nine times out of a hundred, things checked out, but sometimes the source was wrong,” Anderson said.

    Overall, Anderson was more adept at policy advice than political in-fighting. After internal disputes in 1982, he left the Reagan administration, where he had been a success as policy development director, and returned to Hoover, where in 1998 he was named the Keith and Jan Hurlbut senior fellow. In my view the White House never did find an adequate replacement for Anderson as domestic policy chief.

    Anderson continued an active life after leaving the administration. One of his projects was a book, “Imposters in the Temple,” drawing from his early experience as a 28-year-old tenured professor of finance at Columbia University to explore what he saw as left-leaning instruction in higher education.

    He was a member of the President’s General Advisory Committee on Arms Control from 1987 to 1992, beginning under Reagan and continuing into the presidency of George H.W. Bush. He was also for five years a trustee of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation.

    Citing his service, Nancy Reagan issued a statement lauding him and his wife, which concluded: “Loyal men like Martin Anderson come along very rarely in one’s life, and I will miss him terribly.”

    For all the good he did as a presidential adviser, it was as writer and editor that Anderson most made his mark.

    The Hoover Institution Press will next month publish Anderson’s final book, co-authored with Annelise Anderson, “Ronald Reagan: Decisions of Greatness.” I’ll be at the front of the line to read it.

    Funeral services are pending at Alta Mesa Funeral Home in Palo Alto.

    Lou Cannon worked 26 years for The Washington Post and is the author of “President Reagan: The Role of a Lifetime.”


    Peter Hannaford -- Reagan Aide and Fast Friend By Craig Shirley

    Source: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/09/11/peter_hannaford--reagan_aide_and_fast_friend.html#!

    September 11, 2015


    It is a truism of American politics—and American life—that like-minded individuals tend to find one another. It wasn’t an accident that George Washington attracted smart and fearless men such as Alexander Hamilton and the Marquis de Lafayette because George Washington was smart and fearless. Franklin Roosevelt attracted politically passionate and civic-minded individuals because he was one himself. John Kennedy was drawn to intellectually curious individuals, and in turn drew them to himself, where they became part of Camelot.

    So it’s no surprise that Ronald Reagan brought many good men and women, including speechwriters, to him before and during his presidency because he himself was a man of superior character who also happened to be a good writer. That description also fits long-time Reagan aide Peter Hannaford, who passed away several days ago at the age of 82.

    Peter died after he finished doing what he loved to do, which was sign books and give a talk about a new book he’d just edited, “Washington Merry-Go-Round: The Drew Pearson Diaries, 1960-1969.” Over the course of his life, he wrote six books on Ronald and Nancy Reagan. But he did more, much more, than that.

    Going back to the early 1970’s, Peter became an invaluable aide and confidant to both Nancy and Ronald Reagan, a rare status he occupied with only a few others, including Michael Deaver and Edwin Meese. After Reagan’s governorship ended, Peter and Mike Deaver went into business together, forming a public relations firm, “Deaver and Hannaford,” that used the two syllable-three syllable cadence Peter often used in his writings. 

    They had many clients, but first among equals was always Ronald Reagan, whose speaking schedule, syndicated column and radio commentaries they handled, making money for themselves and for the Reagans.

    It was these columns and radio commentaries, heard by millions from early 1975 to late 1979, which formed the basis of Reagan’s successful 1980 presidential campaign. But Peter did more. He returned early from an African vacation to join the campaign in February of 1980 following the ouster of Deaver and other key aides—John Sears, Charlie Black, and Jim Lake—by Reagan himself. After that, Peter gave both Reagans much-needed peace of mind by staying by Reagan’s side until his historic win in November 1980.

    Peter and Reagan drafted the historic acceptance speech at Detroit in 1980, a speech which called for a “community of shared values,” and openly reached out to Democrats to join that coalition. Four months later, they did just that, and by the millions, thereby becoming an integral part of the Reagan Revolution. 

    Deaver followed Reagan to Washington where he became deputy White House chief of staff. Peter stayed on the outside, remaining a valued friend and confidant to the Reagans.

    Late in life, he settled in the Northern California coastal city of Eureka, where he kept writing and became active in a local congregation, the Christ Episcopal Church, which will host a memorial service on Saturday.

    “His death was an incredible shock,” church Pastor Susan Armstrong told the Eureka newspaper. She said his faith had become important to him in recent years, and that only last year he went through the formal process of confirmation. “He was constantly sending me newspaper articles about young people in the church and how we could attract young people to the church.” 

    His widow Irene expressed the hope that a full congregation would be present on Saturday, and I am confident her wishes will be honored. Peter met Irene on a blind date in high school more than 60 years ago. They were married six months later and have two sons. Peter also leaves behind a world of friends and admirers, and I include myself in both categories. He helped me with my own Reagan books, always generous with his time and meticulous in his recounting of facts. The old phrase, “a gentleman and a scholar,” often came to mind when I thought of him. 

    Peter Hannaford, RIP.

    Craig Shirley is the author of two best-selling books about Ronald Reagan, including “Rendezvous With Destiny” and “Reagan’s Revolution.” He is also the author of the best-selling “December 1941; 31 Days That Changed America and Saved the World” and is the president of Shirley & Banister. He is now writing several more books about Reagan, including “Last Act.” He has lectured at the Reagan Library, is the Visiting Reagan Scholar at Eureka College, and is a member of the Board of Governors of the Reagan Ranch.


    Paul Laxalt, Reagan’s ‘First Friend’ in U.S. Senate, Dies at 96 By Laurence Arnold

    Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-08-07/paul-laxalt-reagan-s-first-friend-in-u-s-senate-dies-at-96

    August 6, 2018


    Paul Laxalt, the Republican U.S. senator from Nevada who was President Ronald Reagan’s closest friend and confidante in Congress, has died. He was 96.

    Laxalt died Monday at a Virginia health care facility, according to the Associated Press, citing The Ferraro Group, a public relations firm. No cause of death was given.

    A senator from 1975 to 1987, Laxalt served as campaign chairman of all three Reagan presidential bids -- unsuccessful in 1976, victorious in 1980 and 1984 -- and enjoyed unusual access to the Reagan White House. With the approval of Majority Leader Howard Baker of Tennessee, Laxalt attended top-level meetings even though he held no post in the Republican Senate leadership. He became known as the “First Friend.”

    “I had the privilege of serving in a role that caused me to have one foot in the Senate and one foot in the White House,” Laxalt said at a 2000 hearing on legislation that awarded the Congressional Gold Medal to Reagan and his wife, Nancy. “I served, in a sense, as the president’s eyes and ears on Capitol Hill, while also serving as a link to the White House for my colleagues in Congress.”

    Reagan, who died in 2004, met Laxalt while both were supporting Barry Goldwater’s presidential campaign in 1964. They grew closer during their time as governors of neighboring states, Nevada and California.

    “Ronald Reagan valued his counsel, in part because they were both genial conservatives who shared a gift for attracting Democratic and independent voters, as Laxalt had done in campaigns for governor and senator in his home state,” Reagan biographer Lou Cannon wrote in “Governor Reagan: His Rise to Power.”

    Point Man

    Laxalt, as Reagan’s point man on political matters involving the Interior Department, played a central role in the selection of James Watt as interior secretary, according to Cannon.

    After Watt mocked affirmative action in a 1983 speech --“I have a black, I have a woman, two Jews and a cripple. And we have talent,” he said, describing the makeup of a commission reviewing Interior’s coal-leasing program -- it was Laxalt who advised Watt “to resign gratefully,” which he did, Cannon wrote.

    Paul Dominique Laxalt was born Aug. 2, 1922, in Reno, Nevada, and raised in Carson City, the first of six children of immigrants from the Basque region of southern France. His mother, the former Therese Alpetche, ran the French Hotel in Carson City; his father, Dominique, raised sheep.

    Laxalt attended public school in Carson City and then, for three years, Santa Clara University in California. Following his service as a U.S. Army medic during World War II, he completed his undergraduate degree and earned his law degree at the University of Denver in 1949.

    Election Bids

    He was district attorney of Ormsby County from 1950 to 1954 and city attorney for Carson City from 1951 to 1954, according to his congressional biography. He ran successfully for lieutenant governor in 1962, serving in that role from 1963 to 1967 during the second term of Governor Grant Sawyer, a Democrat.

    In 1964, while lieutenant governor, he ran for U.S. Senate against the Democratic incumbent, Howard Cannon, and lost by fewer than 100 votes. He then challenged Sawyer for governor in 1966, and won.

    Laxalt took office at the start of 1967, just as Reagan was taking over in California. The two Republican governors worked together on a bi-state agreement that created the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency to oversee development at Lake Tahoe, the resort area that straddles their border.

    Also as governor, Laxalt helped Howard Hughes, the billionaire aviator, filmmaker and recluse, obtain the gaming license that enabled him to purchase several Las Vegas casino hotels.

    “He was a savior of Las Vegas at a time when it was very close to going into bankruptcy,” Laxalt told Nevada magazine.

    Laxalt left office in 1971 after declining to seek a second term as governor. With his family, he helped build and run a casino hotel, the Ormsby House, in Carson City. His role there led to one of the biggest disputes of his career.

    Casino Dispute

    The Sacramento Bee and two sister newspapers reported in 1983 that the Internal Revenue Service had suspected that money was “skimmed” from the casino’s profits to avoid payment of taxes. Laxalt sued the publisher, McClatchy Newspapers, for libel. In 1987, as the case was nearing trial, the two sides settled. Without retracting its initial story, McClatchy agreed to a statement saying, “Extensive discovery taken in this libel action has not shown that there was a skim at the Ormsby House.”

    In 1974, Laxalt won election to the U.S. Senate, defeating Democrat Harry Reid -- who would succeed him in the Senate 12 years later and rise to leader of Senate Democrats.

    When Reagan began his challenge to President Gerald Ford in 1975, Laxalt was his only Senate supporter.

    “As a U.S. senator and former governor, Laxalt was the only member of the entourage to approach Reagan as an equal,” Cannon wrote. While other top campaign aides addressed Reagan as “governor,” Laxalt called him “Ron.”

    In 1987, as Republicans began jockeying to succeed Reagan, Laxalt made a brief run for the nomination. He never relished the nuts and bolts of campaigning -- or governing, for that matter -- and he called his presidential bid “the four most miserable months of my life.”

    He had six children with his first wife, the former Jackalyn Ross. That marriage ended in divorce. He married the former Carol Wilson in 1976.


    Remembering a Great Strategist: John Sears By Craig Shirley

    Source: https://www.newsmax.com/craigshirley/schweiker-reagan-ford/2020/03/30/id/960542/

    March 30, 2020


    The venerable Republican consultant and conservative activist Charlie Black once said, "Ronald Reagan would not have become president had he not hired John Sears in 1976 —and fired John Sears in 1980."

    There was great wisdom in this observation.

    The Ronald Reagan campaign of 1976 came within an eyelash of defeating the incumbent Gerald Ford for the Republican Party nomination. It was, in essence, a rag tag operation manned by junior varsity operatives and a handful of conservative activists. Nobody in the GOP establishment thought much of Reagan at that time, dismissing him as the "George Wallace of the Republican Party."

    The only establishment consultant in 1975 who thought Reagan had what it took to be president was John Patrick Sears. Sears, though a Nixon man, had escaped the Watergate brush.

    As of 1976, all of the remaining talent of the GOP — and there wasn’t much — were supporting the moderate Gerald Ford. He was the accidental president by way of Richard Nixon’s resignation. The Watergate scandal took out Nixon and cleared out a whole crop of GOP consultants as a result.

    Sears, having joined Team Reagan as campaign manager, gave the Californian immediate credibility with the East Coast political reporters who were drinking buddies and social friends of Sears’. Politics and political geography in 1976 was astonishingly different from today.

    While the 1976 campaign was often bumbling and mismanaged, it also had flashes of brilliance, as in the North Carolina and Texas primaries, which Reagan won despite being heavily outspent by the Ford campaign. The choice of Senator Richard Schweiker was also brilliant.

    A recent obituary in The New York Times said that Sears’ advice to Reagan to pick respected Senator Dick Schweiker of Pennsylvania as his running mate, prior to the August convention, was "dubious" and "presumptuous."

    The Washington Post’s obituary of Sears also got the story wrong, erroneously saying the Schweiker stratagem and the effort to get Ford to name his running mate before the delegates voted "backfired."

    This is the problem when liberals record conservative history and don’t bother to talk to the people who were there. First, they have built in biases, and second, they are flying through a cloud of ignorance.

    Neither reporter bothered to speak to the people who actually were there working on the 1976 or 1980 campaigns with Sears.

    The astute choice of Schweiker as engineered by Sears was in fact two fold; prying loose some delegates was only one potential outcome. The other was to keep Reagan’s hopes alive until the August GOP convention.

    In early July of 1976, Sears learned that CBS was working on a story; the network was going to pronounce Ford as the nominee, weeks ahead of the convention. This announcement was coming after an arduous counting of almost 4,500 GOP delegates, including some 200 uncommitted delegates. "The CBS Evening News," as manned by the estimable Walter Cronkite, was a broadcasting juggernaut.

    If "Uncle Walter" said something, you could bank on it.

    And Reagan’s campaign would have been dead in July of 1976.

    The choice of Schweiker was really about buying time for Reagan. When CBS learned that Reagan had made the audacious, revolutionary and creative choice of Schweiker — before the conventionthey killed the story. Picking Schweiker bought three precious weeks for the Reagan campaign.

    Had Reagan’s campaign been proclaimed dead in the water, long before the convention, he would not have had the opportunity to carry the fight to Kansas City in a dramatic vote, which Reagan lost by the narrow margin of 1,180 to 1,069 or to give his extemporaneous speech: the speech which changed the GOP, leading delegates to question their choice of Ford and paving the way for Reagan to run and win in 1980.

    The New York Times obituary also completely missed the importance Sears played in the now famous Nashua debate of 1980. Sears, along with Reagan’s New Hampshire chairman, Jerry Carmen, were the architects of the scene where George H. W. Bush froze, while Reagan responded forcefully. Sears once told me, bluntly, "Our job was to show that Bush was not capable of being president."

    Charlie Black said, "We knew Bush would choke . . . " Carmen kept sticking it to Bush in the press any chance he got and pressuring Bush to agree to debate with Reagan.

    The debate was supposed to be a one-on-one between Reagan and Bush but at the last moment, Sears decided that, under the guise of "fairness," the other candidates including Senators Bob Dole and Howard Baker along with other aspirants should be included. Bush balked but Reagan welcomed them. The moderator, Nashua Telegraph editor Jon Breen, also objected. But to avoid violating campaign rules at the time, the Reagan campaign ponied up the $2,000 to pay for the staging of the debate.

    When Breen said the other candidates could not participate, and told the technician to turn off the Gipper’s microphone, Reagan stormed, "I paid for this microphone Mr. Green!!!!" setting him up to win the New Hampshire primary; propelled him to the 1980 nomination, the 1980 general election, and into the history books. The Post simply gave short shrift to the Nashua debate.

    All this and more was due to John Sears. Reagan fired Sears on the day of the New Hampshire primary but John was always philosophical about it. He told me he’d accumulated too many enemies and was no longer an asset to Reagan. Sears was never suited to be a campaign manager. The 1976 and 1980 campaigns were sometimes poorly run because it simply wasn’t Sears’ strength. His strength was strategy, not managing people or money.

    We got to become friends in later years as I wrote my books on the 1976 and 1980 campaigns and what surprised me about John was how shy he actually was. He enjoyed a drink, a good game of cards and politics, as befitting any good political operative, but there was also a side to him that craved privacy.

    And there was never really good chemistry between him and Reagan although Sears and Nancy Reagan got along well. For a time.

    Reagan once complained, "John doesn’t look you in the eye, he looks you in the tie."

    But after his brilliance of the 1968 Nixon campaign and his sometimes cleverness of the 1976 and 1980 Reagan campaigns, John never worked in national politics again.

    He once told me, "it’s nicer on the sidelines."

    He also had a wry sense of humor. When the matter of picking a running mate for Reagan came up in 1976, someone floated the idea of picking Jim Rhodes, the odious and curmudgeonly and shady governor of Ohio. Rhodes could have potentially delivered enough delegates to Reagan to win the nomination, but Sears rejected the idea quipping, "You’ve got to have some responsibility in this business."

    There are a number of men over the many years who aided Reagan at critical times when he needed it most: Paul Laxalt, Ed Meese, Lyn Nofziger, George Bush, Ken Khachigian, Jim Baker, Mike Deaver, Marty Anderson, Frank Donatelli, Ed Rollins, Fred Ryan, Bob Heckman, Ralph Galliano, Roger Stone, Jim Lake, Stu Spencer, Peter Hannaford, Dick Wirthlin and many others including his White House speechwriters. Each had his own season with Reagan. All were trusted Reaganites and all were trusted by Reagan.

    John Sears — as much as any of these aforementioned men — helped Reagan change the world.

    RIP John Sears.

    Craig Shirley is a Ronald Reagan biographer and presidential historian. His books include, “Reagan’s Revolution, The Untold Story of the Campaign That Started it All,” “Rendezvous with Destiny, Ronald Reagan and the Campaign that Changed America,” "Reagan Rising: The Decisive Years," and “ Last Act: The Final Years and Emerging Legacy of Ronald Reagan." He is also the author of the New York Times bestseller, “December, 1941” and his new 2019 book, “Mary Ball Washington,” a definitive biography of George Washington’s mother. Shirley lectures frequently at the Reagan Library and the Reagan Ranch. He has been named the First Reagan Scholar at Eureka College, Ronald Reagan’s alma mater and will teach a class this fall at the University of Virginia on Reagan. He appears regularly on Newsmax TV, Fox News, MSNBC, and CNN. For more of his reports, Go Here Now.


    Top Reagan aide Jim Lake, who grew up in Bakersfield, dies at 82 By Robert Price

    Source: https://www.kget.com/news/local-news/top-reagan-aide-jim-lake-who-grew-up-in-bakersfield-dies-at-82/

    Jun 3, 2020



    CALLAO, Va. (KGET) — They were sometimes jokingly called the Bakersfield Mafia — three men, all bred in Bakersfield, who rose to prominence in the 1960s and ‘70s as key members of Team Ronald Reagan: Michael Deaver, Lyn Nofziger and Jim Lake.

    The third of those three, Reagan campaign press secretary Jim Lake, passed away May 29 at his home in Callao, Virginia. He was 82 and suffered from complications of Alzheimer’s.

    Reagan’s star was a good one to cling to.

    Nofzinger was Reagan’s press secretary when Reagan was elected governor in 1966. Deaver served as Gov. Reagan’s chief of staff. Lake was press secretary for Reagan’s political campaigns. And when Reagan was elected to the White House in 1980, all three men, in some fashion or form, went with him, and all three became nationally prominent.

    Lake also worked for Gerald Ford and George H.W. Bush.

    Lake’s son James C. Lake of Alexandria, Virginia, got involved in politics with his father and his twin brother Michael B. Lake.

    “We’d see them together all the time, either on the campaign trail” or elsewhere, said James C. Lake, a communications consultant. “My brother and I both worked during the (election season) ad campaign. We were on the campaign jet, so we flew everywhere they went. And so we got to see (Reagan), be with him all the time … (as) his campaign went on.

    “In the (1976 primary) Ford campaign, we both worked advance so we always saw my dad travel with (Reagan). We talked to my dad while the president was speaking, got to see him, interact with Reagan. My brother and I interacted with Reagan and Mrs. Reagan — we saw them a lot. They knew who we were because they were great friends with my father, but also because we were twins. We kind of stood out.”

    It might seem strange or coincidental that three Bakersfield men came to share the stage, to differing extents, with the most powerful man on earth, and arguably the most popular.

    Mojave journalist Bill Deaver, Michael Deaver’s brother, had an explanation.

    “They all had to be in the right place at the right time with the right kinds of personalities and interests. And that’s what happened” he said.

    Jim Lake might have been a Beltway guy but he never forgot where he came from, his son said. Lake was always a Bakersfield Driller with a taste for Dewar’s ice cream that he still occasionally enjoyed with his granddaughter, Megan who still lives in Bakersfield.

    “Dewar’s was one of his favorites,” said his son Jim. “It still is whenever we go there. He used to like Sinaloa — it’s closed now — but that Mexican food was his favorite — and Mexicali …  He always loved the Wool Growers. That’s where he first introduced us to sliced pickled tongue. I thought it was going to be horrible but it was fantastic.”

    So another chapter in the story of Bakersfield’s deep connection to Ronald Reagan comes to an end.

    According to Lake’s obituary published in the Washington Post, when Reagan successfully sought the nomination for president in 1980, Lake served as communications director and campaign press secretary until the eve of the New Hampshire primary, when he and other top aides were dismissed because of campaign disagreements with other long-standing Reagan aides. He and others were later reinstated, according to the Post obituary.

    During Reagan’s 1984 re-election campaign, Lake again served as communications director and campaign press secretary,  according to the Post obituary. In the 1988 and 1992 presidential campaigns, Lake advised George H.W. Bush on press and media communications, and served as deputy campaign manager in his ’92 bid for re-election. Lake was a top GOP official at four Republican conventions, according to the Post obituary.

    James Howard Lake was born Aug. 16, 1937, in Fresno, and attended Bakersfield High school and Bakersfield College. He received his B.A. degree from the University of California at Los Angeles. After working in the grocery and family businesses, Lake entered California politics in 1966, helping two-time Olympic Decathlon Champion Bob Mathias defeat an incumbent to be elected to the U.S. Congress, according to the Post obituary. 

    Between presidential campaigns and thereafter, Lake advised agricultural and corporate clients on government relations and strategic corporate communications. 

    In the early 1980s, he was instrumental at Heron Burchette Ruckert & Rothwell in establishing the practice of law firms accepting non-lawyers as key members of the firm, according to the Post obituary.

    He was also a frequent political commentator on CNN and Fox News.

    In 1997, Lake married his second wife, Cynthia S. Hudson, and they resided together in Alexandria and Callao, Va. Survivors include his wife; twin sons, James C. Lake (Rhonda) of Alexandria, and Michael B. Lake (Chelsea) of McLean, Va.; a brother, Monte B. Lake (Susan) of Callao, Va.; eight grandchildren; six great grandchildren; many nieces; nephews; grandnephews, and a grandniece.

    He was preceded in death by his sister, Joan Madison, son, Garrett D. Lake and niece, Catherine M. Lake. Celebrations of life will be held at later dates. The Lake and Hudson families request that in lieu of flowers, anyone wishing to honor Lake do so by making a donation to the MINDlink Foundation (mindlinkfoundation.org/donate). The foundation was established in Catie Lake’s honor to support the pioneering cerebellum research of Dr. Jeremy Schmahmann’s Laboratory or Neuroanatomy and Cerebellar Neurobiology at Massachusetts General Hospital.