Monday, October 11, 2010

Can skinflint Mitch Daniels win the presidency? By Michael Barone

Source: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Can-skinflint-Mitch-Daniels-win-the-presidency_-1155088-104600004.html

October 10, 2010

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels speaks at a press conference in support of a campaign to promote the passage of a referendum that would make property tax caps in Indiana part of the state constitution in Indianapolis, Wednesday, Sept. 15, 2010. (AP Photo/Michael Conroy) (AP)

It's an ornate office in Indiana's beautifully maintained mid-19th-century Capitol, but the 49th governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels, is not dressed to match the setting. He's just returned from spending the night in Princeton, Ind., staying at a constituent's house -- as he often does around the state -- and he's dressed in a work shirt and jeans.


I've known Mitch Daniels since he was a staffer for Sen. Richard Lugar in the 1980s, and for years he struck me as one of the least likely candidates for public office. He's got strong, mostly conservative convictions; he doesn't suffer fools (and elected politicians) gladly; he doesn't care if others don't like him. All those characteristics were on display when he ran the Office of Management and Budget for George W. Bush between January 2001 and June 2003.


But when he returned to Indiana from Washington, he started running for governor and was elected with 53 percent of the vote in 2004. After four sometimes controversial years as governor -- he sold off the North Indiana Toll Road and persuaded the legislature to smooth out the state's time zone boundaries -- he was re-elected 58 percent to 40 percent in 2008 even as Barack Obama was carrying the state.


As much as any American politician of his generation, he's proved that cutting spending and gaining a reputation as a skinflint is good politics.


Now Daniels is being mentioned as a presidential candidate and he doesn't deny that he's thinking about it. He's been holding dinners with national policy experts in Indianapolis, much as George W. Bush did in Austin a dozen years ago.


And he says that, if he runs, he'll be a different kind of candidate. As for "the federal fiscal picture -- and why don't we have the philosophic debate tomorrow -- as for today, can we agree that the arithmetic doesn't work? We're going to have higher and higher levels of debt."


He goes on. "This is a survival-level issue for the country. We won't be a leader without major change in the federal fiscal picture. We're going to have to do fundamental things you say are impossible."


He believes that "Democrats are better positioned to do this, but they're not going to lead. This will probably be a Republican responsibility." To do what, exactly?


To propose "fundamental changes in entitlements and in the size and scope of the federal government." Because "the machine is going TILT."


He thinks voters may be ready to support such changes because they've had a searing experience with debt and their lives are changing. Younger people may be ready to put up with lower Social Security benefits for high earners because they've seen that some companies' new hires aren't getting the pensions and benefits their elders got. "There's nothing radical about this. It's already happened all over the place."


He's also got some more short-term proposals -- a payroll tax holiday to stimulate the economy, reviving the presidential power of impoundment (not spending money Congress has appropriated), a moratorium on federal regulations.


As OMB director, Daniels was on the National Security Council, and as governor he's visited Indiana troops around the world; he says "it's important to support the commander in chief" on Afghanistan. But he's open to cuts in defense spending beyond those Secretary Robert Gates has imposed. "No question that the system is rigged to overspend," he says, "like health care. No question that defense dollars could be spent better."


"But back to not becoming Greece," he says. "Can we continue with every mission we've assigned the military indefinitely? Is every one essential to the safety of Americans?"


"The answer may be yes," he concedes, "but you may have to stop doing some things completely. We are now borrowing the entire defense budget from international investors."


You can almost see the green eyeshade as he speaks. It's been noted that Daniels is short, balding (with a combover), that he speaks with just a bit of a Southern country twang (he moved to Indiana from Tennessee and Georgia at age 10): hardly a glamorous candidate.


"I'm not a long-range planner," Daniels says, when asked if he's running. "I play the ball where it is." But if he runs, he promises to be more of a long-range planner if he runs than any presidential candidate we have ever seen.


Michael Barone,The Examiner's senior political analyst, can be contacted at mbarone@washingtonexaminer.com. His column appears Wednesday and Sunday, and his stories and blog posts appear on ExaminerPolitics.com.

Sunday, October 03, 2010

Feckless Congress Flies The Coop



Source: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/549027/201009301853/Feckless-Congress-Flies-The-Coop.htm

09/30/2010

Leadership: How can a Congress with such a large majority of Democrats, plus a Democratic president, tell voters with a straight face that it can't pass a budget? Answer: For them, acting is less popular than stalling.


In the 14th-century poem "Parlement of Foules," Chaucer dreams of a comic parliamentary debate of birds. In 21st century America, our birdbrain legislature is a nightmare come true.


Why would a Congress so firmly in the hands of one party and one ideology have to enact a continuing resolution to forestall a government shutdown, instead of passing a budget as required under law? When it has no worries about the president vetoing such a spending plan (he isn't running for re-election this year), why can't it get its act together?


Because congressional Democrats are in a state of panic. They know an electoral catastrophe is looming, and inaction is easier to defend than action — especially actions such as spending trillions and letting the biggest tax increase in history take effect.


This is the first time in modern history that both the Senate and House of Representatives have not been able to pass a simple budget resolution. With discretionary spending up 28% over the last two years, as the Heritage Foundation has noted, Democrats' laughable claims of a spending freeze will leave voters cold.


Another reason House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and their Democratic majority wanted to get out of Dodge without finishing what they started is that a vote on the Bush tax cuts might very well have blown up in their faces — thanks to moderate Democrats who want to keep their jobs.


But even if Pelosi and Reid had won a vote on the tax cuts, vulnerable Democrats would still be on the record. Those voting for the big tax increases would be hurt electorally by such a roll call, of course. But those voting to keep the Bush tax cuts would be an embarrassment to Democratic leaders. Better to wait till after the election and have a lame-duck vote, safe from the ire of the ballot box.


As independent Democratic Sen. Joseph Lieberman told the Associated Press: "It was going to be mutually assured destruction" if they held votes or debates on the matters before them.


It seems like any vote would have been the equivalent of a Republican campaign ad. Passing a budget would have brought the voters' attention to the fact that this Congress is spending America into a new space-time continuum.


Voting on the ethics cases before it — such as that of Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., pushed out as House Ways and Means Committee chairman but embarrassingly poised to be re-elected in his Harlem district — would let Americans see the corruption at the heart of Washington's power center.


But there's no escaping the voters. They will now take note that America's Parliament Most Foul has flown the coop rather than fulfill its responsibilities.

New Fiscal Year, Same Fiscal Irresponsibility By Rep. Charles Djou

Source: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/548973/201009301810/New-Fiscal-Year-Same-Fiscal-Irresponsibility.htm

09/30/2010

Friday marks the start of a new fiscal year for the federal government and provides an opportunity to assess the fiscal health of our nation. The diagnosis is grim.

The federal government now spends $7 million a minute. Our national debt is more than $13 trillion, which means every man, woman and child owes $42,000 to foreign governments and other debt holders.

In the next two years, our debt will exceed the size of our economy. Within three years, the government will spend more than $1 billion a day just to pay the interest on our debt. The debt will double in 10 years.

Unprecedented fiscal recklessness is to blame. Nonsecurity discretionary spending has increased by nearly 90% over the past three years. The federal government is spending money it doesn't have while working families and small businesses must find ways to make do with less.

What has all this spending done for Americans? Since the $800 billion stimulus package was passed in early 2009, we have lost nearly 3 million jobs and the unemployment rate has consistently hovered around 10%. And every business in America knows that where reckless spending is found, higher tax rates are sure to follow.

After spending so wildly with nothing to show for it, the new fiscal year ought to mark the beginning of renewed fiscal restraint. Sadly, we're beginning fiscal year 2011 on even shakier footing.

For the first time since modern budgeting rules were adopted in 1974, the U.S. House of Representatives will fail to pass a budget. Without a budget, we cannot set priorities, review our debt, rationally consider our revenue or direct the course of spending for our nation.

The news only gets worse. By Oct. 1 of each year, Congress is also supposed to have passed the 12 appropriations bills that fund the federal government for the new fiscal year. This year, Congress has yet to pass any of these 12 critical appropriation measures.

But hope is not lost. Fiscal 2011 does not have to be like last year. We can turn things around. We can pass a budget, end the spending binge and make the necessary appropriations. We can provide the certainty that businesses need to grow and create jobs.

The first step is to cancel unspent stimulus funds and block any attempt to extend the timeline for spending such funds. We can save another $100 billion by returning government spending to pre-stimulus levels. Next, we should cap discretionary spending, cut Congress' budget and end the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).

By making these common-sense reforms, we will return our nation to economic stability and prosperity. It's not too late. This should be our fiscal new year's resolution.

• Djou is a newly elected congressman representing Hawaii's 1st Congressional District, the first Republican in 20 years to do so.

Friday, October 01, 2010

New method makes adult cells act like embryonic ones By Dan Vergano

Source: http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2010-10-01-cell01_ST_N.htm

September 30, 2010

Stem cell researchers on Thursday reported a new method for reprogramming adult cells into ones that act like more versatile embryonic stem cells, an advance that could open a new avenue for lab-grown transplant tissues.

Stem cells are the building blocks from which replacement cells, everything from blood to bone to brain, grow in early development and throughout life. Researchers consider embryonic stem cells the most useful type for generating replacement tissues, but obtaining them requires the controversial destruction of embryos. Then, in 2006, a Kyoto University team first reported adult skin cells can be "induced" into resembling embryonic stem cells.





That breakthrough relied on viruses infecting cells with four cancer-related genes to spur the transformation. But the new study pulls off the trick with ribonucleic acid (RNA) molecules, normally the workhorses that translate DNA-encoded genes into proteins and perform other housekeeping roles inside cells.


In the journal Cell Stem Cell, a team led by Derrick Rossi of Children's Hospital Boston unveils a cancer-mutation-free method, 40 to 100 times more productive than normal, to create induced stem cells. Induced stem cells are similar to embryonic stem cells in their potential to transform into every type of tissue in the body — but lack the controversy.



"This is very exciting," Rossi says. "We have a new experimental process that can efficiently give us patient cells in clinically useful types."


"RNA, if it works, sounds like a very realistic, promising alternative," says stem cell biologist Gary Stein of the University of Massachusetts Medical School in Worcester, who was not part of the study. Worries about virus contamination and cancer have dogged induced stem cells since their discovery, he notes, along with concerns about their low efficiency rate, with perhaps one cell in 1,000 transforming through the use of viruses.


Treating adult human cells with RNA engineered to overcome immune system defenses reliably creates induced stem cells, the study says. Moreover, the same RNA molecule cued to fire up different genes over three days' time can then be used to turn those induced stem cells into specific types of tissues, such as muscle.


For that reason, "this paper is a major advance in the field of regenerative medicine," says stem cell researcher Douglas Melton of Harvard, who was not part of the study team. Since the isolation of human embryonic stem cells in 1998, researchers have sought ways to turn early stem cells into heart, spine and other tissues needed by transplant patients. The RNA advance means labs can experiment on deriving these tissues in test tubes, he says, speeding progress in the field.

Saturday, September 25, 2010

PHLASHBACK: Your Stake in Local Schools: TOO OFTEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS WASTE YOUR TAX MONEY. HERE'S HOW TO FIX THAT. By Denise M. Topolnicki


Source: http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/moneymag_archive/1990/05/01/85813/index.htm

Reporter associate: Deborah Lohse

May 1, 1990

(MONEY Magazine) – America's 83,000 public schools are spending more but educating our 40 million schoolchildren less. Last year, U.S. taxpayers paid about $4,500 per pupil, up an inflation-adjusted 28% just since 1982. Yet all those dollars aren't buying much progress. For example, only 73% of today's ninth-graders will complete high school on schedule, compared with 79% in 1969. And scores on standardized college entrance exams have slipped 6% since the late 1960s.

You may be tempted to shrug off that lamentable record, especially if you don't have children riding the familiar yellow bus each morning. Whether you acknowledge it or not, however, you have a direct stake in public education:

-- As an employer, you depend on public schools for workers -- 88% of U.S. youngsters train there for jobs.

-- As an employee, you consider how good an education your kids will receive before accepting a job in another city. In fact, nearly four out of five MONEY subscribers with school-age children rate the local schools as an ''extremely'' or ''very'' important factor in such a move, according to our latest Americans and Their Money Poll (see page 96).

-- As a citizen, you count on the schools for the civil servants, soldiers, bureaucrats, scientists and myriad others who will determine our country's place in an increasingly competitive economic world.

-- And perhaps most personally, as a taxpayer you are paying for public education. If you are like the MONEY subscribers we surveyed, you are probably aware of the schools' problems and are willing to pay more. Two out of five readers say their community's property taxes have gone up since 1988 because of rising school costs. Yet nearly 40% think too little is spent on education in their districts vs. only 10% who think spending is too high.

Given our willingness to throw dollars at the problem, it's no wonder that the national debate about how to fix our foundering schools focuses on financing. Liberals argue that children from rich and poor districts won't get comparable educations unless schools stop relying so heavily on local property taxes. Conservatives, on the other hand, contend that competition -- not cash -- will make mediocre districts shape up. Their solution: give parents cash vouchers that can be used at any area public or private school. What both sides ignore, though, is that making a school system great takes more than money. Solid funding is important, of course, but it's hardly a cure-all.

To discover what elements really foster excellence in education, MONEY set out three months ago to study two public school systems -- one that has consistently produced topnotch students, another that hasn't. To assure a fair comparison, we asked SchoolMatch, a Columbus, Ohio firm that advises relocating individuals and corporations on school quality, to identify two systems that were similar by all standard measures except for scholastic achievement.

It would be hard to imagine two communities more alike on paper than Geneva, Ill. and Delran, N.J. Both are farming towns recently transformed into bedroom suburbs for nearby metropolises (in Geneva's case, Chicago, and in Delran's, Philadelphia). Geneva's population is 12,224 and Delran's, 13,940; their median household incomes are $43,993 and $43,584; and their proportions of minorities are 3% and 10%.

When it comes to schooling, Delran spends 4% more per pupil -- $4,521 to $4,358. Yet on academic measures, Geneva triumphs (see the summary above). Geneva's students score at the 83rd percentile on a standard college entrance exam -- 33 points above the national average for schools with more than 40 students taking the test. Fully 60% of its 164 graduating seniors went on to four-year colleges last year, six won commendation from the National Merit Scholarship Program, and one was an NMSP semifinalist. By contrast, Delran's college entrance exam scores last year ranked in the bottom half of New Jersey schools, which, as a group, are already slightly below the national average. Only half of the 170 graduates entered four-year schools. There were two NMSP- commended students and no semifinalists.

To learn why these results are radically different, two MONEY reporters first consulted with leading educators and other specialists on school quality and then spent a week in each town. The reporters sat in classes, attended evening events, mingled with students in the halls and at after-school hangouts, and interviewed school board members, administrators, teachers, parents and students. While we found good and bad in both systems, we identified six crucial factors -- described on the pages that follow -- that contribute to Geneva's success. Our aim, however, is not to point the finger at Delran (which is in the midst of shaking up its educational system) nor even to praise Geneva. Instead, this article presents guidelines for excellence that citizens and taxpayers like you can bring to any school system, beginning with your own.

The two communities

Drive into Geneva, 36 miles west of Chicago, and you immediately sense a reverence for bygone days. Victorian mansions and modest bungalows are lovingly maintained. Antique shops line downtown streets. ''This is the kind of place where kids see their teachers outside of school, swimming at the town pool or bicycling downtown,'' says Kathryn Bleck, a native Genevan who teaches first grade at the Fourth Street School.

Drive into Delran, 15 miles east of Philadelphia, and you're not quite sure you've arrived. Gertrude Stein's pithy description of her native Oakland -- ''There's no there there'' -- fits this south Jersey collection of shopping centers and cul-de-sacs. There's no downtown, just a neon strip of discount stores and fast-food outlets along Route 130. The community didn't have its own high school until 1975 and still lacks a library. Says Michael Gallucci, the principal of Delran High School: ''In a town based on automobiles and shopping malls, the schools are a lighthouse that people come to for socialization and sports.''

Establishing the right priorities

That light was shining brightly one evening in March as more than 200 boosters packed the steamy spectators' gallery above Trenton State College's pool to cheer Delran to its first state swimming championship. It was a lopsided victory: Delran trounced Scotch Plains-Fanwood 99-57. ''Being a spectator at a swim meet is about as exciting as watching paint dry, but look at how many people came out for this,'' exulted school superintendent Bernard Shapiro. Physics teacher Daryl Taylor, wearing swimmer's cap and goggles, started the crowd undulating in the rolling cheer known as the wave. Afterward, the winners climbed on the fire department's hook-and-ladder for an 11 p.m. victory parade, as is the custom when a team wins a state crown. Incredibly, this was Delran's 10th (including six in soccer) in 15 years.

This is what high school is supposed to be about, right? State championships, victory parades?

Of course it is. But it's not all that school is supposed to be about. Unfortunately, Delran's academics suffer, in part because many teachers and administrators send students the message that sports are more important than books. At Millbridge Elementary School, for example, a third-grade teacher combines her class with another teacher's whenever it interferes with her duties as a high school soccer coach. And at the high school, guidance department head Sandra Wasinda thinks nothing of mailing a student's application to Rutgers University even though it is late. ''He's a good soccer player, so his application will go directly to Rutgers' soccer coach,'' she explains with a smile. ''There are deadlines, and then there are deadlines.'' Although no administrator could explain why the school day in Delran is shorter than the state average, Daniel Topolski, principal of Millbridge Elementary School, ventured a guess: ''Transportation is probably the issue. Most athletic games begin at 3:30, and we need to have the buses free by then so they can move teams.''

To their credit, the nine members of Delran's elected school board want more attention paid to academics. Last July the board replaced superintendent Joseph Chinnici, 56, who had been in the job for 24 years, with the affable Shapiro, 51, a butcher's son who was a strong academic leader as principal of a nearby town's high school. ''The board has made it clear that they suspect there's a great deal of untapped academic potential in the district,'' says Shapiro. Yet it's also obvious that Shapiro cannot push sports aside without alienating the community. Says Ralph Clifford, the district's business administrator: ''You'd have World War III at the next school board meeting if you even suggested cutting out the championship girls' and boys' soccer teams.''

Geneva's students, on the other hand, get a clear message about what's important. Says superintendent Donald Marcotte: ''This community's mandate to us is to maintain high academic standards.'' While Geneva hasn't won a state sports title since the 1930s, the school isn't filled with nerds feigning illness to avoid gym class either. In fact, 55% of Geneva's students play interscholastic sports vs. 33% in Delran. That's because all but one of Geneva's teams have no-cut policies -- since sports are for fun, not glory.

Getting the parents involved

Geneva citizens communicate their passion for education through volunteerism. Three years ago, for example, the school system bought 80 computers with $125,000 raised from private contributions to the Geneva Academic Foundation, a nonprofit community group. The foundation was created by Warren ''Bud'' Gilligan, 60, a retired General Motors executive who has seven grown children, two of whom graduated from Geneva High School. ''I've lived in five states,'' says Gilligan, ''and these schools have more parental involvement on the academic side than any others I've seen.''

Geneva's parents give time as well as money. In all three elementary schools, for instance, five to six volunteers spend one morning each week helping kids illustrate their own stories and poems and bind them into booklets, each stamped with the imprint of the fanciful Pirate Publishing Co. The three schools also offer weekly after-school enrichment programs in February and March. At Western Avenue School, parents recently taught kids Spanish and chess. Other students brought in pets -- including two corpulent turkeys -- for show-and-tell.

In Delran, parental involvement -- as described by students, teachers and parents -- usually means sports booster clubs or helping to make elaborate floats for the homecoming parade. Students who wish to attend enrichment programs have to travel to a neighboring school district on Saturdays. Faculty members, in fact, seem pleased that the adults don't interfere. Says Charlene Burd, a middle school guidance counselor: ''Parents here are interested in their children's education, but they're not overly demanding.''

Emphasizing scholastic fundamentals

Many of Delran's brightest students say they can score good grades without much effort. ''You can get away with murder here, like cut class for two weeks but still pass,'' says Beth Carroll, a student who takes accelerated courses and hopes to attend the New School for Social Research in New York City next year. Students with high grade-point averages routinely skip final exams because the tests don't have much impact on final grades. Many kids also say it's easy to lighten up by choosing undemanding courses from a curriculum crammed with electives, including ''Science Fiction'' and ''Care and Prevention of Athletic Injuries.'' Compared with Delran's smorgasbord of offerings, Geneva's curriculum is as circumscribed as the Pritikin diet. Top educators say that's a good sign. ''In the 1970s, we went too far with curriculum options,'' says Gerald Grant, professor of education and sociology ! at Syracuse University and author of The World We Created at Hamilton High (Harvard University Press, $9.95). ''Kids took 'How to Fix My Bachelor Pad' but never really learned how to write a good paragraph. We need to get back to a common standard of achievement.''

At Delran, superintendent Shapiro doesn't want to toss out the electives, but he is trying hard to enrich all the classes. He's asked the school board to hire nine curriculum supervisors to help reform the content of courses from kindergarten through 12th grade. He has also tapped Stephen Falcone, the high school's assistant principal for academic affairs, to make final exams tougher. One of Falcone's first moves: asking teachers to submit finals to him for review before they are given to students. Says he: ''Parents may be satisfied, but I'm not. Our SAT scores are inexcusable.'' Predictably, his blunt manner hasn't won many allies. ''He thinks that we're all degenerates,'' grouses a senior planning to attend a local college. One teacher has vowed to organize faculty opposition to his exam plan.

Educating teachers to educate

''Close your eyes and see if you can see a little movie of Christina's story in your mind,'' says teacher Mary Bencini at Geneva's Western Avenue School. The 17 rapt second-graders, sitting on a blue rug in her homey classroom, obediently shut their eyes as seven-year-old Christina Maley starts to read a story she has written about a fairy who gives a young dancer a pair of pink ballet slippers. Several listeners squint in concentration as they imagine the fairy's ''flowing flowered lacy dress.'' When Christina is finished, Bencini sets off a lively give-and-take by asking the class to name fairy-tale elements used in the story.

Bencini's ability to bring literature to life springs not only from her own talents but also from nurturing by Geneva's schools. Teachers are required to keep up their skills by taking college courses or serving on educational committees. Explains former Salt Lake City school superintendent Donald Thomas, now an educational consultant: ''A teacher who doesn't follow new developments is like a doctor who doesn't know how to use the latest equipment.'' Bencini has taken seminars on how to help children think more clearly by improving their reading and writing skills. And she heads a faculty committee that invites children's book authors to speak to students. The committee also gets students' stories and poems published in a local newspaper.

Delran teachers aren't required to continue their educations, and only 32% hold advanced degrees, compared with 50% in Geneva. There are signs of change, however. Says Marge Gessmann, president of the union that represents Delran's teachers: ''Since superintendent Shapiro was hired, we've seen more educational committees formed and more of a focus on staff development. Teachers are now encouraged to attend training programs during school hours.''

Maintaining adequate facilities

Gifted teachers can work their magic anywhere, but experts contend that kids feel better about themselves -- and consequently do better academically -- if their school is clean, well equipped and cheerfully decorated. ''Ill-tended buildings don't promote self-worth and pride,'' observes John Goodlad, director of the Center for Educational Renewal at the University of Washington in Seattle.

Although none of Delran's schools are dilapidated, two of its elementary schools, Aronson Bell and Cambridge, look as if they don't belong in the same district with the third, Millbridge. More than 600 students, mostly from Delran's most affluent subdivisions, attend 21-year-old Millbridge, which has 29 classrooms. The two other schools serve older, less pricey neighborhoods. Aronson Bell, built in 1907, accommodates just 150 students in seven classrooms. Kids eat lunch in a dreary basement cafeteria and have music class in a corner of the gym (see the photograph on page 88). At 72-year-old Cambridge, which handles 165 youngsters in seven classrooms, a movable partition divides a basement room that's used for art and remedial courses.

No such disparities exist in Geneva's schools. Administrators were careful to create equal facilities when they added on to the Western Avenue and Harrison Street schools, on the town's moneyed west and less affluent east sides, respectively. Says Ronald Anderson, principal of Harrison Street: ''People on the east side feel slighted because the pool, high school and library are all on the west side. We made sure that this facility would be equal to Western Avenue.''

Nurturing a cooperative environment

On the playgrounds at Geneva's Harrison Street or Western Avenue elementary schools you will see a wonderful sight: specially trained pupils, called conflict managers, helping to settle disputes. They are taught by two teachers and a social worker to listen to combatants' complaints and guide them to solutions. Is the program working? All too well, in the view of bored peace officers who were hungry for action. Fifth-grader Chris Goebel complains: ''I haven't had any conflicts for two or three months.'' The program's purpose, of course, is to minimize school-time disruptions without creating a police state. Delran's administrators and teachers have been less innovative and successful at peacekeeping. You could see it during a lunch period at Aronson Bell, for example, when an aide with a whistle dangling from her neck shouted kids into silence, or as teachers stood guard outside Delran High rest rooms signing students in and out.

Sharing a vision

Perhaps the most important lesson to be learned from these schools has less to do with education than with consensus and purpose. In Geneva, administrators, teachers, parents and students work together to achieve common goals set down in writing in the district's mission statement, which is updated annually.

At Delran, unfortunately, the same players sometimes operate at cross- purposes because they haven't agreed upon an educational mission for the schools. To transform the system, superintendent Shapiro knows he must sell everyone -- administrators, teachers, students and their parents -- on the importance of academic success. ''We'll all have to agree that learning is important,'' he says. ''Then we'll have to convince students that learning isn't threatening.''

BOX: TWO SCHOOL SYSTEMS HEAD TO HEAD

Money alone doesn't improve education, as these statistics show. Though Delran, N.J. spends 4% more per pupil than demographically similar Geneva, Ill., its students rate lower in several leading indicators of academic success.

Geneva, Ill. Delran, N.J. Population 12,224 13,940 Median household income $43,993 $43,584

Residents age 25 and older who are high school graduates 87% 77% Public school enrollment 2,388 2,219

Spending per pupil $4,358 $4,521

Students taking college entrance exams 77% 78% Average college entrance exam scores 20.6 (ACT) 876 (SAT) State average 18.8 (Ill.) 896 (N.J.) National average 18.6 (U.S.) 903 (U.S.) Graduates attending four-year colleges 60% 49% Graduates attending two-year colleges 15% 27%

Sources: National Planning Data Corp., Census Bureau, Delran and Geneva school districts

BOX: AMERICANS and their MONEY HOW PARENTS HELP OUT AT SCHOOL

Nearly all of the 150 MONEY subscribers with children in public schools who were polled recently by the Gallup Organization said they, their spouses or both participated in programs at their kids' schools.

WHO'S INVOLVED 14% Father only 30% Mother only 43% Both parents 13% Neither parent

Note: The statistics on parental participation are based on a telephone survey of 150 MONEY subscribers in late March. The margin of error is plus or minus eight percentage points. Poll results elsewhere in this article are based on a telephone survey of 300 randomly selected subscribers with an error margin of plus or minus six points.

Geneva Schools Are In The Money

Source: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1990-04-27/news/9002040163_1_new-jersey-schools-educational-quality-students

April 27, 1990|By Katherine Seigenthaler.

Ironically enough, nationally circulated Money magazine concludes in its May issue that ``intangibles count more than money`` when it comes to education-and it uses the school system in Geneva to prove its point.

The folks at Money undertook a three-month study of two school systems-in Geneva and Delran, N.J. The point was to determine whether higher spending necessarily made for better educational quality.

The two systems were selected by SchoolMatch, a ``school quality specialist`` company, which determined that Geneva and Delran are outwardly very similar.

Both are farming towns-turned-bedroom suburbs, located near major cities

(Delran is outside Philadelphia). Both have populations of about 13,000, median household incomes of about $44,000, similar school enrollments, and a similar amount spent per pupil.

But Geneva High School students scored in the 83rd percentile on a recent standard college entrance exam, while Delran`s college entrance exam scores last year ranked in the bottom half of New Jersey schools. Furthermore, 60 percent of Geneva students attend four-year colleges, while 49 percent of Delran`s students do the same.

Happily for Geneva, where school administrators have been walking on the ceiling since the article came out, Money concludes that it`s a community which has the ``right`` priorities when it comes to education.

The school system, Money found, emphasizes academics over sports (even if that means it hasn`t won a state championship since the 1930s); Geneva`s parents donate a considerable amount of time volunteering at the schools; the curriculum ``is as circumscribed as the Pritiken diet,`` meaning the fundamentals are stressed; teachers are required to continue taking college courses; the system`s facilities are top drawer in both higher and lower income areas; and teachers work with students to ``minimize school-time disruptions without creating a police state.``

By contrast, Money says, poor old Delran, which has won 10 state athletic championships in 15 years, is a place where academics suffer because students get the message that sports are more important; parental involvement ``usually means sports booster clubs or floats for the homecoming parade; the kids can take ``Science Fiction`` or ``Care and Prevention of Athletic Injuries``; continuing education of teachers is not required; schools in lower income areas look shabbier; and teachers are less successful at keeping the peace.

``This was so gratifying for us because we didn`t contact them,`` says Geneva Supt. Donald Marcotte. ``It was something out of the clear blue. Since then, we`ve been getting calls from all over the country.``


Balancing Scholastics, Sports

Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20160405184505/http://articles.philly.com/1990-05-02/news/25887076_1_varsity-sports-program-students-in-both-districts-high-school Posted: May 02, 1990

In Delran both school and sports are special, residents say. It's not an either/or choice.

"We don't have a center of town," said Delran Police Officer Len Mongo. ''The schools, the (athletic) fields - they're our gathering places."

Unlike neighboring Riverside and Moorestown, where intimate downtown business districts antedate the automobile, Delran's convenient commercial areas stretch for miles along Route 130. People get around by car, even in Victorian-era sections such as Bridgeboro and Cambridge.

"Sports teams and schools serve to bring new and old together," said school board President Ron Napoli. "Sports are important to people in Delran. People use them as a basis of community identity."

But Delran's treatment of both schools and sports was called into question last week. A national magazine blamed Delran's outstanding varsity sports program - which has won 10 state championships since the high school was founded in 1975 - for diverting energy from academic pursuits, citing the school's below-average Scholastic Aptitude Test scores. Delran's mean SAT score for 1988-89 totaled 876. The state average was 896, and the national average was 903.

The conclusions were widely reported and angrily disputed in Delran.

In an article titled, "Your Stake in Public Schools," the May issue of Money magazine compared Delran schools with those in Geneva, Ill., a suburb of Chicago. The two districts have similar populations and per-pupil expenditures, and both have family incomes of around $44,000. The Money article emphasized the difference in scores for college admission tests, which are taken by more than three-quarters of students in both districts.

Delran's SATs are 10 percent below the national average, while Geneva scored 10 percent above average on the American College Test, which is similar. Money magazine blamed Delran teachers and parents for stressing sports over academics; Geneva was praised for innovative facilities, academically engaged parents and highly trained teachers.

Delran students, school board members, educators and elected officials last week rejected the article's conclusions and praised township schools.

Although many residents, standardized test experts and state Department of Education officials pronounced their satisfaction with the status quo by extolling Delran's virtues - and attacking Money magazine - Mayor Richard S. Knight called on residents to "improve wherever we don't come up to our own or anybody else's standards."

Bernard Shapiro, who started as school superintendent in September, said he was already implementing new academic improvement programs. "Give us an opportunity," he said. "We feel strongly that we can do better. I came here because I felt this could be a lighthouse district. It will be. Even if state dollars are lacking."

Gov. Florio froze state school district funding at 1989 levels, leaving local school districts trying to meet increased costs through local property taxes.

Shapiro promised verifiable academic improvement within three to five years.

Shapiro, who came to Delran after serving as principal of Haddon Township, Cherry Hill East and Cherry Hill West High Schools, wanted to run his own system. He was attracted to Delran by what longtime colleague Barry MacGibeny, now principal at the district's middle school, called "the great sense of pride, the absolutely marvelous tone in Delran schools. The teachers and students really want to be here!"

"He was the only candidate I listened to the whole time," said board Vice President Robert Mull, who, with other board members, grilled applicants last spring. Mull was won over by Shapiro's "progressive goals, objectives and dreams of how to improve a school district. He talked about holding staff accountable for the academic results of the students."

The board chose Shapiro to replace Joseph Chinnici, whose 35 years of service spanned the township's development from villages and pastureland to a busy suburb of 14,000.

Shapiro got right to work, quickly earning a reputation as an accessible and hands-on administrator. Staff and students were alternately delighted and suspicious of a package of academic reforms.

Those reforms included an intensive writing program, a joint curriculum committee for all grade levels, exam reviews, continuing teacher education programs, a college scholarship committee and a business-and-education committee - all of which, Shapiro and his principals say, actively solicit participation from students, educators and residents.

High school English department supervisor Dorothy Mongo, who is married to Police Officer Len Mongo, said she appreciated Shapiro's tenacity in getting the school board to approve the writing program. "We thought it was pretty much stymied when the state budget cuts came through. But he has worked wonders getting funding at a time we never thought we'd get it."

That fight over funding may not be over yet. For the first time in nine years, voters last week rejected the local school budget. The 1990 proposal would have improved the school writing program, but also boosted local property taxes 14 percent, which school board leaders blamed on state funding cuts. The Township Council has until May 14 to approve or revise the budget.

Delran's schools have become stricter, according to several seniors, many of them scholar-athletes. But Money's portrayal of sports infringing on academics had some elements of truth in the past, they said.

"The article would have been true five years ago," said student Dusty Paddock, head of the school audio-visual crew. "Our past principal, David Lamberne, was into pep rallies."

Phil Bigge, co-captain of the championship high school swim team, agreed. ''The third-grade teacher doesn't leave early to coach the swim team anymore," he said. "She stopped that last year." The coach's practice of combining her students with those in another class in order to make practice sessions was featured in the Money article.

Senior Tim Lyall, student representative on the Delran school board, believes that athletics complement academics. But Lyall thinks sports do crowd out other extracurricular activities. "Fine arts doesn't get the attention," he said.

John West, a Purdue Drive resident whose grandchildren attend Delran schools, made the same assertion. "They support sports all the way down the line," he said at a recent Township Council meeting. "The rest of student activities they leave to fend for themselves."

English teacher Kathy Russell, who was recently named high school Teacher of the Year at Delran by a committee of parents and teachers, is trying to redress that imbalance by offering course points for attending school plays, said Lyall and Paddock. "She used to do it just for girls' basketball," said Bigge.

Delran High School junior Jennifer Hall said academic standards have become stricter in the last year. A triple-varsity athlete since starting high school, Hall said teachers have returned from new instructors' training courses to implement creative methods, such as small-group debating in English class.

But senior Michael Maerten, who agreed school has grown stricter, said staff and students have been caught unprepared by the hands-on approach of the new vice principal for academic affairs, Stephen Falcone, who has called for improvements to SAT scores and an exam review program.

"There was a lot of opposition at first," said Maerten. "People were shell-shocked. He was sitting there watching over your shoulder all the time. We're not used to seeing principals in the hallway a lot. Our old vice principal stayed in his office."

Several of the seniors said history department head Michael Kennedy, who is also the swim team coach, was a prime example of the union between academics and athletics that propels Delran students to success. Swim team co-captain Dean Hutchinson and Lyall said more than half of the 17 students enrolled in Kennedy's advanced placement history and biology classes this semester are also varsity athletes. In biology, six of seven are varsity team members, and in history, it's three of 10.

"History's intense," said Hutchinson, who said he spends seven to 10 hours a week practicing during the season and a like amount on homework.

Kennedy, president of the school district supervisors' union, is a Delran graduate who attended Susquehanna University on a football scholarship. "Our whole team is Academic All-American, with at least 3.0 grade-point averages," he said. "Every study I ever saw bears out a strong correlation between athletic and academic achievement." Kennedy said his experience coaching football and basketball players, college-bound or not, showed they were ''better students when the season is in progress than out."

High school principal Michael Gallucci is worried Delran may suffer in comparison with schools that stress only academics. Just as many students believe sports compete more with other extracurricular activities than with studies, some observers fear that Delran's character as a comprehensive high school balancing academic, business and technical education may become unbalanced if too much emphasis is placed on college preparation.

Robert Gaven, township road crew supervisor and a school board candidate who came within two votes of unseating eight-year incumbent and former school board President Dorothy Oppman on April 24, said he believes in "basic functional education.

"Vocational training is a good thing. If too many kids go to college, you don't have the technical skills and computer training to repair automobiles. We put too much importance on some of the other activities. Our kids need jobs."

But Lyall and other college-bound seniors said solid academic training is increasingly a prerequisite for technical jobs as well as college.

In contrast, said Lori Davis, director of curriculum at Geneva public schools in Illinois, most technical education students at Geneva are sent out of the district to vo-tech schools, a fact not mentioned in the Money article.

"We were pleased how we were written up," Davis said. "However, we really had concern for the (Delran) school district and how it came across. We feel sorry for them. Let's hope this will be the article that helps them change to what they need to be. I hope it will help them improve."

"The article was a complete misrepresentation," said Delran senior Beth Carroll, who was quoted in the Money article as saying that Delran students could miss two weeks of class without falling behind. "They lied" about her quote, she said.

"Who's Money magazine?" said Councilman Bill Smock at an April 25 meeting of the Township Council in which the article was discussed at length. ''They're the same people who a couple of years ago were praising (insider trader) Ivan Boesky as the second coming of Jesus Christ. Now he's in prison. Our kids go to college."

Delran schools won nothing but praise from New Jersey Department of Education monitors, who do not consider SAT scores because the proportion of students taking them varies among districts. "We monitored Delran in March of 1989, and they came out extremely well," said Arthur Merz, supervisor of the department's Burlington County office. "It's among the tops in the county. Delran is a totally rounded school system."

Mayor Knight said the favorable state evaluation was remarkable because a large proportion of township youth attend Holy Cross, an academically oriented Catholic high school, and are not included in the survey.

State testing director Stanley Rabinowitz said Delran, along with many suburban districts, is comfortably above average in its High School Proficiency Test scores, its student-teacher ratio, its low dropout rate, low per-pupil cost, and its college placement rate, especially for two-year colleges.

"Districts need to be evaluated against the goals they set for themselves," said Arthur Kroll, vice president of The College Board's Program Division, the organization that administers SATs. Condemning the Money article as "pseudoscientific" and "irresponsible," Kroll said that turnover, attendance and basic skills testing - which the state measures in its annual ''public school report cards" - are more valuable than SAT scores in assessing a district's success.

But Delran's goals are clearly changing.

"We're sufficient now in sports," said Delran school board vice president Mull. "It's almost like we're a minor league team anymore. Sports has its place. That's one reason we brought Dr. Shapiro in: to improve our academics.

"If we could bring our academics to where our sports is, we'd be the best program in the state.

"And we will get there. It's just a matter of time. We will get there."

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Gangster Gov't Stifles Critics Of ObamaCare By Michael Barone

Source: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/547123/201009131900/Gangster-Govt-Stifles-Critics-Of-ObamaCare.aspx

09/13/2010

'There will be zero tolerance for this type of misinformation and unjustified rate increases."


That sounds like a stern headmistress dressing down some sophomores who have been misbehaving. But it's actually from a letter sent last Thursday from Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to Karen Ignagni, president of America's Health Insurance Plans — the chief lobbyist for private health insurance companies.


Sebelius objects to claims by health insurers that they are raising premiums because of increased costs imposed by the ObamaCare law passed by Congress last March.


She acknowledges that many of the law's "key protections" take effect later this month and does not deny that these impose additional costs on insurers. But she says that "according to our analysis and those of some industry and academic experts, any potential premium impact ... will be minimal."


Well, that's reassuring. Er, except that if that's the conclusion of "some" industry and academic experts, it's presumably not the conclusion of all industry and academic experts, or the secretary would have said so.


Sebelius also argues that "any premium increases will be moderated by out-of-pocket savings resulting from the law." But she's pretty vague about the numbers — "up to $1 billion in 2013." Anyone who watches TV ads knows that "up to" can mean zero.


As Time magazine's Karen Pickert points out, Sebelius ignores the fact that individual insurance plans cover different types of populations. So that government and "some" industry and academic experts think the new law will justify increases averaging 1% or 2%, they could justify much larger increases for certain plans.


Or as Ignagni, the recipient of the letter, says, "It's a basic law of economics that additional benefits incur additional costs."


But Sebelius has "zero tolerance" for that kind of thing. She promises to issue regulations to require "state or federal review of all potentially unreasonable rate increases" (which would presumably mean all rate increases).


And there's a threat. "We will also keep track of insurers with a record of unjustified rate increases: those plans may be excluded from health insurance Exchanges in 2014."


That's a significant date, the first year in which state insurance exchanges are slated to get a monopoly on the issuance of individual health insurance policies. Sebelius is threatening to put health insurers out of business in a substantial portion of the market if they state that ObamaCare is boosting their costs.


"Congress shall make no law," reads the First Amendment, "abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press."


Sebelius' approach is different: "zero tolerance" for dissent.


The threat to use government regulation to destroy or harm someone's business because they disagree with government officials is thuggery. Like the Obama administration's transfer of money from Chrysler bondholders to its political allies in the United Auto Workers, it is a form of gangster government.


"The rule of law, or the rule of men (women)?" economist Tyler Cowen asks on his marginalrevolution.com blog. As he notes, "Nowhere is it stated that these rate hikes are against the law (even if you think they should be), nor can this 'misinformation' be against the law."


According to Politico, not a single Democratic candidate for Congress has run an ad since last April that makes any positive reference to ObamaCare. The First Amendment gives candidates the right to talk — or not talk — about any issue they want.


But that is not enough for Sebelius and the Obama administration. They want to stamp out negative speech about ObamaCare. "Zero tolerance" means they are ready to use the powers of government to threaten economic harm on those who dissent.


The closing paragraph of Sebelius' letter to AHIP's Karen Ignagni gives the game away: "We worked hard to change the system to help consumers." This is a reminder that the administration alternatively collaborated with and criticized Ignagni's organization. We roughed you up a little, but we eventually made a deal.


The secretary goes on: "It is my hope we can work together to stop misinformation and misleading marketing from the start." In other words, shut your members up and play team ball — or my guys with the baseball bats and Tommy guns are going to get busy. As Cowen puts it, "worse than I had been expecting."

The Democrats' Fannie Is Showing

Source: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/547134/201009131900/The-Democrats-Fannie-Is-Showing.aspx

09/13/2010

Irresponsibility: After the global financial crisis, no politician would dare chide another for too much "safety and soundness." But in 2004, 76 Democrats actually asked President Bush not to manage Fannie Mae responsibly.


There are smoking guns and then there are smoking bazookas. The June 28, 2004, letter from Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and dozens of other House Democrats to President Bush, posted by Moe Lane on Redstate.com last week, forever squashes Democratic claims about the mortgage crisis not being their fault.


"We urge you to reconsider your administration's criticisms of the housing-related government sponsored enterprises (the 'GSEs') and instead work with Congress to strengthen the mission and oversight of the GSEs," states the missive of nearly a page and a half, signed by a rogues' gallery of 76 House Democrats.


They include not only Frank, current chairman of the House Banking Committee; but Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., now being probed for reportedly laundering TARP money in her husband's bank; and erstwhile House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., who is charged with more than a dozen counts of violating House rules and federal laws.


Almost comically, the letter states that the Democrats are unhappy the Bush administration is "emphasizing only safety and soundness," claiming that "an exclusive focus on safety and soundness is likely to come, in practice, at the expense of affordable housing."


And the Democratic representatives charged that "because Congress has not been willing to jeopardize the GSEs' mission, the administration has turned to attacking the GSEs publicly."


Such attacks could mean "negative opinions in the financial markets regarding the GSEs, raising their cost of financing."


It turned out, of course, that the negative opinions of Fannie Mae, and its evil twin Freddie Mac, in the financial markets were due to the GSEs taking a lead role in crippling the global economy.


The GSEs used the taxpayer-funded financial power of the federal government to give ultralow rate mortgages to millions of Americans with rotten credit ratings — which ended up poisoning the portfolios of investors around the world.


That Fannie and Freddie are disasters is, of course, today undeniable. Even Frank last month told Fox Business Network's Neil Cavuto regarding Fannie and Freddie, "I think they should be abolished."


In an election year in which voters are sick of governmental largesse and Uncle Sam's mismanagement of everything, and in which even Frank's "safe" seat in Taxachusetts is endangered, Frank doesn't dare say anything less.


Six years ago was another story: "Join us," Frank and the 75 other Democrats were demanding, "in advocating for more innovative loan products and programs for people who desire to buy manufactured housing, similar products to preserve as affordable and rehabilitate aging affordable housing, and more meaningful GSE affordable housing goals."


They insisted that President Bush "place a high priority on working with the GSEs to close as many loans as possible this year" and reiterated "that an exclusive emphasis on safety and soundness . .. is misplaced."


The 9.6% unemployment that Americans now suffer is directly connected to the many years of Democrats' demagoguery. They said that any attempt to rein in Fannie and Freddie was anti-poor and anti-minority — fiscal soundness be damned.


With the worst attributes of government entity and private business, Fannie Mae holds about $6 trillion in mortgages. These GSEs' reduced capital requirements and exemptions from state and local taxes let them eventually corner about half of the entire U.S. mortgage market.


President Bill Clinton added a "Trillion Dollar Commitment" to give 10 million poor Americans their own homes, and he intensified President Jimmy Carter's Community Reinvestment Act.


The cumulative result was that banks and other lenders were pressured to give mortgages to unqualified borrowers in the name of social and racial justice. Last year, the Obama administration raised Fannie and Freddie's $400 billion borrowing cap.


Every single politician who signed this letter is guilty of taking part in the gross financial mismanagement of this country. They betrayed the trust of those who elected them, and that trust should be rescinded this November.

The Era Of Health Care Rationing Begins By Sally C. Pipes

Source: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=547365

09/15/2010

The cancer drug bevacizumab, or Avastin, is pricey but well worth it to insured patients. ASSOCIATED PRESS

The cancer drug bevacizumab, or Avastin, is pricey but well worth it to insured patients. ASSOCIATED PRESS View Enlarged Image

Supporters of health reform said it would never happen. Maybe they got caught up in their own rhetoric. Maybe they just didn't want to believe it was possible. But rationing in America has started.


This week, the Food and Drug Administration is expected to revoke approval of the drug Avastin for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Louisiana Republican Sen. David Vitter has described the anticipated move as "the beginning of a slippery slope leading to more and more rationing under the government takeover of health care."


It seems that even loyal Democrats have noticed the Obama administration's not-so-subtle policy shift toward rationing. According to Politico, many of the 34 House Democrats who voted against the health reform bill are aggressively touting their "no" votes in campaign ads.


The FDA claims its decision won't be based on cost, but Avastin isn't cheap — a full regimen costs about $100,000 a year.


Jean Grem of the FDA's Oncology Drug Advisory Committee was cited in the Wall Street Journal explaining why she voted to deprive breast-cancer patients of Avastin: "We aren't supposed to talk about cost, but that's another issue."


Two years ago, the FDA approved Avastin for breast cancer on the condition that further research would show the drug extended life expectancy. Everyone expected the drug to maintain its approval. Avastin has proven to be a wonder drug for countless women with stage IV breast cancer, slowing the disease's progression and dramatically extending life.


But when no significant increase in "overall survivability" was reported this summer, an FDA advisory panel recommended that Avastin's approval be withdrawn. Top FDA officials must decide by Friday whether they will accept or reject the panel's counsel.


No cancer drug has ever been taken off the market based solely on "overall survivability." Traditionally, calculations of a drug's effectiveness have been based on tumor response and progression-free survival rates.


Here, Avastin is a miracle drug. In the manufacturer's critical phase III study, tumors shrank in nearly 50% of patients receiving the medicine. Patients who received Avastin in conjunction with chemotherapy lived nearly twice as long as would otherwise be expected without their disease worsening.


For some patients — known as "super-responders" — an Avastin regime translates into years of additional life.


If the FDA strips Avastin of its approval, it's likely that private insurers and Medicare would stop covering the medicine, effectively removing Avastin from the anti-breast cancer arsenal.


Government rationing doesn't stop at Avastin.


Medicare coverage for Provenge, a drug for advanced prostate cancer, is also in jeopardy. Like Avastin, Provenge is expensive. Created using a patient's own white blood cells, the drug costs $93,000. The FDA has already approved Provenge as safe and effective, yet Medicare officials are currently deciding whether it will pay for the medicine.


If officials decide Provenge isn't worth covering, it will mark the first time Medicare has refused to pay for an FDA-approved anti-cancer drug.


The outrage over the administration's campaign against expensive but effective drugs has not been muted. Major cancer advocacy groups like Susan G. Komen for the Cure and the Ovarian Cancer National Alliance have come out in strong support of both Avastin and Provenge.


It's terrifying to think that distant, faceless bureaucrats are now making Americans' health care decisions. Welcome to Obama-Care.


• Pipes is president and CEO of the Pacific Research Institute. Her new book, "The Truth About Obamacare" (Regnery), was just released.

The Shariah Threat

Source: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=547571

09/16/2010

Islamofascism: A panel of national security experts concludes that Shariah law is a totalitarian ideology that is being used by advocates of tolerance to undermine the security of the United States.


Challenging the prevailing political correctness regarding tolerance, outreach and endless apologies to the Muslim world for defending ourselves against terrorism, the 177-page report by the Center for Security Policy, "Shariah: The New Threat To America," objectively analyzes the assault on the West by Islamofascism and warns of the grave threat posed by those who seek to use Shariah law to undermine America's legal system, Constitution, national security and way of life.


The report, whose authors included former defense, law enforcement and intelligence officials such as Clinton administration CIA Director R. James Woolsey and Andrew C. McCarthy, former assistant U.S. attorney in New York, a career counterterrorism prosecutor during the Clinton administration, was released Wednesday at a Capitol Hill press conference.


The report concludes the Shariah system is "totalitarian" and incompatible with the U.S. Constitution, our system of democratic lawmaking and the constitutional guarantees of freedom of conscience, individual liberty and freedom of expression, including the right to criticize Shariah law itself.


We have seen evidence of Shariah creeping into our culture and our legal and financial systems. In June 2009, a New Jersey state judge decided that a man who punished his wife with pain for hours and repeatedly raped her was not guilty of criminal sexual assault, citing the man's religious beliefs. The ruling was reversed by an appellate court. Maybe it won't be down the road.


In November 2009, a high school senior was suspended in order to protect him from violence when he wrote an essay criticizing perceived special treatment for Somali Muslims in his school. In Dearborn, Mich., Christian missionaries were arrested for proselytizing at an Arab festival. In Minnesota, the state accommodates Shariah's prohibition on interest payments by buying homes from realtors and reselling them to Muslims at an up-front price. Since when does government structure financial transactions to accommodate a single religious code? Apparently in the Constitution there is no separation of mosque and state.


Shariah is used around the world to condone barbarities such as the stoning and subjugation of women and the execution of homosexuals. It does not support freedom of speech, conscience or religion or even equal treatment under the law


The report cites the 1991 document from the Muslim Brotherhood in North America describing a covert process of Islamic "settlement" in the United States. The plan is to carry out a "grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated," the document stated.


Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, who would build a mosque within shouting distance of Islamofascism's greatest triumph, the destruction of the World Trade Center, is similarly a fierce advocate of Shariah law and the role it can play in undermining the West.


Rauf has written that "it is clear an Islamic state can be established in more than just a single form or mold. It can be established through a kingdom or a democracy. The important issue is to establish the general fundamentals of Shariah that are required to govern." Is making America an Islamic state his ultimate goal?


At an Iftar dinner at the White House celebrating Ramadan, President Obama said Rauf had a legal right to build his mosque from which Shariah will be preached and gay and lesbian Muslims will not be welcome. But we too have a right — to keep our eyes open and not be lulled into complacency in the name of tolerance.